Michael Fassbender

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Michael and Alicia did a long weekend of promotion for an art film, which did not raise their profiles in any way.

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattison did four years of saturation promotion for one of the biggest movie franchises in all time, going from complete unknowns to the objects of obsession for a whole legion of fans.

The two situations are not comparable in any way.
Using a relationship as a story for entertainment and promotional value -- comparable. I was not talking about their celebrity profiles.
 
I don't understand what the issue is. Michael promoting his next release with his co-star, who also happens to be his girlfriend. Is there some rule book they didn't follow ?

They are like any other normal couples.

During Alicia's Bourne promotion in Beijing, some fans gave her the TLBO poster to sign and requested her to convey the message to Michael - "please come to China" and she replied ok. So fans are actually having fun meeting the other half of a couple. ***seethe signature on the poster *** IMG_1471676623.865017.jpg
 
Michael and Alicia did a long weekend of promotion for an art film, which did not raise their profiles in any way.

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattison did four years of saturation promotion for one of the biggest movie franchises in all time, going from complete unknowns to the objects of obsession for a whole legion of fans.

The two situations are not comparable in any way.

No words for that... And what has Pattinson to do with fassbender, then? It's off topic again, it's nothing different from the Brie Larson's tweet posted few days ago, who got removed cos it started a "war" here.

I won't even comment the article and compare the situations. [emoji23]
 
  • Like
Reactions: pearlyqueen
No words for that... And what has Pattinson to do with fassbender, then? It's off topic again, it's nothing different from the Brie Larson's tweet posted few days ago, who got removed cos it started a "war" here.

I won't even comment the article and compare the situations. [emoji23]
Difference is I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion so I don't jump on someone just because their opinions differ to mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carmencrem
Difference is I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion so I don't jump on someone just because their opinions differ to mine.

Yeah, I mean, it shouldn't be treated in a different way by mods, to be fair. Pattinson has nothing to do with fassbender, as Brie Larson had nothing to do with him, right? Some posters felt offended by her tweet being posted here, well, I think some others may feel "pissed" seeing an article which has 0 to do with fassbender -nothing, without even mentioning him!- posted here.
I can't see connections between different people who never met/work together. It's 100% off topic IMO. I know it doesn't reguard Alicia Vikander or now there'd be a earthquake, but it's off topic, anyway. And I find it difficult to catch up with a Fassbender's conversation if we are in Pattinson's thread, right?
Larson's tweet for deleted, well, to be fair that post about Pattinson is not in the right thread here. [emoji847][emoji847][emoji847]
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I mean, it shouldn't be treated in a different way by mods, to be fair. Pattinson has nothing to do with fassbender, as Brie Larson had nothing to do with him, right? Some posters felt offended by her tweet being posted here, well, I think some others may feel "pissed" seeing an article which has 0 to do with fassbender -nothing, without even mentioning him!- posted here.
I can't see connections between different people who never met/work together. It's 100% off topic IMO. I know it doesn't reguard Alicia Vikander or now there'd be a earthquake, but it's off topic, anyway. And I find it difficult to catch up with a Fassbender's conversation if we are in Pattinson's thread, right?
Larson's tweet for deleted, well, to be fair that post about Pattinson is not in the right thread here. [emoji847][emoji847][emoji847]
Well it would be relevant if it had a valid comparison to make but it doesn't. They never said (P&S) anything about a fake relationship. They said the relationship got so it didn't feel like it was just between them anymore. On the other hand Michael and Alicia's relationship is being deemed 'fake' by Michael's fans who can't stand him being with someone who doesn't fit their criteria (hey Michael's not their bloke anymore).
 
Well it would be relevant if it had a valid comparison to make but it doesn't. They never said (P&S) anything about a fake relationship. They said the relationship got so it didn't feel like it was just between them anymore. On the other hand Michael and Alicia's relationship is being deemed 'fake' by Michael's fans who can't stand him being with someone who doesn't fit their criteria (hey Michael's not their bloke anymore).

What exactly is that supposed to mean?
 
Top