TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I don't think it will come out the next year.But yes,he could have some problems because he's still filming TLBO and Sorkin said that filming should begin in the next couple of months. This role requires time.I agree when this article says that tons of films could be made about Steve Jobs. His life was long and he did A LOT. I think that Sony will make a huge film about him, with a stellar cast, a worldwide release and it has everything to be amazing. But like I said, it HAS, I won't say it will be awesome because it's a complex person and a complex life and people's reaction to it is a mystery. Biographies are complicated and sometimes they can be fine and others not, even with amazing people behind it. We have to wait and see.
Michael can totally do it but, like I said before, I don't know if he has the time to do so and Weinstein will play all its cards on his performance in Macbeth next year. Unless Jobs comes out in 2016 only...
I agree when this article says that tons of films could be made about Steve Jobs. His life was long and he did A LOT. I think that Sony will make a huge film about him, with a stellar cast, a worldwide release and it has everything to be amazing. But like I said, it HAS, I won't say it will be awesome because it's a complex person and a complex life and people's reaction to it is a mystery. Biographies are complicated and sometimes they can be fine and others not, even with amazing people behind it. We have to wait and see.
Michael can totally do it but, like I said before, I don't know if he has the time to do so and Weinstein will play all its cards on his performance in Macbeth next year. Unless Jobs comes out in 2016 only...
Even with the Weinstein machine behind him I feel like it will be very difficult for his performance to get significant award traction.
I could be completely wrong and it's not that I don't think the performance won't be great but I can't recall the last time a Shakespeare role was nominated for an Oscar or made any significant splash in the pop culture.... and it's not like there haven't been good Shakespeare performances in the last few years. Kenneth Branagh got an Oscar nod for Henry V but he's Kenneth Branagh, defender of all thing Shakespeare, the nomination felt more like a brand reinforcement... actually most Oscar noms and wins feel like brand reinforcement of some sort.
In order for it to get ahead in the awards race it has to break expectations in some way and it's very difficult to do that with Shakespeare, especially these days.
Macbeth also seems to be too much in Fassbender's wheel house (European, dark character, brooding, violence etc.) to be much of a surprise... now if it was Matthew McConaughey doing the role he'd probably have no problem getting award attention and not only because it's the McConassance.... Lol, can you imagine.
All I can hear now is Matthew McConaughey doing Macbeth...lol.
"Alright, alright, alright, alright. Let not light see my black and deep desires."
All I can hear now is Matthew McConaughey doing Macbeth...lol.
"Alright, alright, alright, alright. Let not light see my black and deep desires."
From what I've read,this Macbeth is a personal work but at the same time is intended to appeal to a modern target. Michael will have great chances of being nominated if the film has a great festival traction and great reviews for his performance.
Even with the Weinstein machine behind him I feel like it will be very difficult for his performance to get significant award traction.
I could be completely wrong and it's not that I don't think the performance won't be great but I can't recall the last time a Shakespeare role was nominated for an Oscar or made any significant splash in the pop culture.... and it's not like there haven't been good Shakespeare performances in the last few years. Kenneth Branagh got an Oscar nod for Henry V but he's Kenneth Branagh, defender of all thing Shakespeare, the nomination felt more like a brand reinforcement... actually most Oscar noms and wins feel like brand reinforcement of some sort.
In order for it to get ahead in the awards race it has to break expectations in some way and it's very difficult to do that with Shakespeare, especially these days.
Macbeth also seems to be too much in Fassbender's wheel house (European, dark character, brooding, violence etc.) to be much of a surprise... now if it was Matthew McConaughey doing the role he'd probably have no problem getting award attention and not only because it's the McConassance.... Lol, can you imagine.
All I can hear now is Matthew McConaughey doing Macbeth...lol.
"Alright, alright, alright, alright. Let not light see my black and deep desires."
Gosh, I didn't realize Michael bears any resemblance to Steve Jobs, but this certainly proves me wrong - https://twitter.com/Golem_13/status/530415177968390144/photo/1
McConaughey playing anything apart from romcoms would be surprising so he has a huge advantage there. Now that everyone thinks he's fallen into a kettle of talent they're always pleasantly surprised about his roles.
Sorry I'm not a big Matt McCon fan. He's just another proof what's wrong with the Oscars.
ETA: Maybe Marion doing Shakespeare could give her the surprise factor they need for a nomination. Though she's European she's not British but French and therefore probably struggling a bit more with the whole language thing (God help me, I already had problems with Bill in German). If she's delivering a stunning performance in this she might get a nomination.
![]()
Two major incredible actors passed on it.