Michael Fassbender

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Many colleagues of mine went to watch it and one of them sent me an email saying "Seriously as much as I like Ridley Scott, this was me during the whole film" adding the gif below :

CaEWgGO.gif


I laughed for a good 30min, because it's the impression that everyone gave me i.e. they were confused as hell.

I'm still looking forward to watch it, it got me fairly curious.
 
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/paramount-brad-pitt-company-feuding-651131

The dispute arises from Paramount’s belief that executives at Plan B breached the company's deal with the studio by failing to offer Paramount a chance to finance and distribute the movie.

Despite the long-standing relationship between Brad Pitt and Paramount Pictures chairman Brad Grey, there is a tense confrontation underway between the studio and Pitt’s Plan B production company over awards contender 12 Years a Slave, according to industry sources.

The dispute arises from Paramount’s belief that executives at Plan B breached the company's deal with the studio by failing to offer Paramount a chance to finance and distribute the movie from director Steve McQueen. In April 2012, a few weeks before filming began, New Regency agreed to co-finance and distribute the picture via Fox Searchlight.

Grey and Paramount declined to comment. Plan B executive Dede Gardner did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did CAA, which represents Pitt and had worked to arrange financing for the film.

12 Years is off to a strong start at the box office in limited release, having grossed $3.4 million so far. Based on the memoir by Solomon Northup and starring an ensemble including Chiwetel Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender and Pitt, the film has shot to the top of most Oscar projectors' best picture lists.

The idea for 12 Years a Slave was first discussed in 2008, when Plan B executives Gardner and Jeremy Kleiner met with McQueen shortly before the director’s first film, Hunger, premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival. Pitt subsequently discussed the project with McQueen in London, and the director began working on a script with writer John Ridley.

According to a source with knowledge of the situation, Pitt is free to accept roles in films at other studios and take a producing credit without cutting in Paramount. But the studio’s position is that Pitt's company must give Paramount an opportunity to come in on projects that Plan B develops.

Paramount is said to be contemplating what steps to take, if any, in the wake of this alleged breach. Grey is said to believe that he was deliberately misled about the project not by Pitt but by Plan B executives.

Grey co-founded Plan B with Pitt and the star's then-wife, Jennifer Aniston, in 2002. Pitt became sole owner in 2006. The company has had a deal at Paramount since
2005.

A source with knowledge of the situation speculates that Plan B may have bypassed Paramount because 12 Years was coming together just as tensions between the banner and the studio were at fever pitch over the troubled production of Plan B’s World War Z. Eventually the third act of the zombie film had to be reconceived and reshot. While the picture eventually grossed $540 million worldwide and Paramount escaped the write-down that some industry observers had predicted, the film did not generate the profit that a studio would desire from a costly tentpole.
 
^^ I was going to wait for this movie to go to DVD but after all the reviews and reactions I've read I have to see why it's so polarising.



Quite a few of the reviews I read said Fassbender was miscast... is that a accurate assessment?

Fassbender isn't bad he's just not given much to do until the end of the movie. Diaz was miscast. Pitt and Bardem are the standouts.

Many colleagues of mine went to watch it and one of them sent me an email saying "Seriously as much as I like Ridley Scott, this was me during the whole film" adding the gif below :



CaEWgGO.gif




I laughed for a good 30min, because it's the impression that everyone gave me i.e. they were confused as hell.



I'm still looking forward to watch it, it got me fairly curious.

Ha. There are parts that are vague. It's debatable if it's intentional or just bad writing/directing but I had friends who said they didn't understand any of it. If you're paying attention you should get the gist of what's happening.
 

Paramount isn't exactly being fair game here, they decided to be bystanders, TYAS was almost going down the toilets had Plan B not fought to find another finance aid, Pitt even financed a part of the film from his own pockets, and it was stalling for months and months and it was only a few months before filming began that New Regency Productions agreed to co-finance TYAS. Also as the film was a very low budget (well $20M is "low" according to the Hollywood standards) Fox made a deal of taking a share in the box-office with Plan B and New Regency, Fox financed mostly the commercial ads etc. And during all that time, Paramount still didn't say nor do anything.

Now because TYAS is critically acclaimed and getting rave reviews and is likely to have succes at the BO, suddenly Paramount says hey-ho-hey? Yeah sure...
 
Last edited:
Fassbender isn't bad he's just not given much to do until the end of the movie. Diaz was miscast. Pitt and Bardem are the standouts.

I thought he was pretty good in the proposal scene. Diaz was basically playing her villainness like Paris Hilton. I don't think she understood what any of her dialogue meant. Pitt was probably my fave, mainly because of this: "Are you a mental defective?"
 
I thought he was pretty good in the proposal scene. Diaz was basically playing her villainness like Paris Hilton. I don't think she understood what any of her dialogue meant. Pitt was probably my fave, mainly because of this: "Are you a mental defective?"
He's good in the proposal scene but it's one of maybe four substantial scenes he has. Diaz doesn't give a nuanced performance. She's just bad. I'm not surprised she didn't do press.

Also, I'm looking forward to all the tumblr screencaps/gifs of MF in his t-shirt and sweatpants. He was undeniably gorgeous in the film.
Yes the black tee and sweats is a good combo. :tup: even though it emphasizes his tiny waist.
 
Yes the black tee and sweats is a good combo. even though it emphasizes his tiny waist.

You know what was really weird? When he's all sweaty and distraught in Mexico in that dirty hotel room and he receives the DVD, his shirt is unbuttoned...why is there partial nudity during his most emotional, dramatic scene and not during the sex scene? That was just tonally weird to me.
 
December Elle UK
"I think of myself as, you know, alright. I used to have bad acne as a teenager, so all of this is a bonus now, the fact that I don't have pimples anymore. And my hair was also, you know, unfortunate. I had really long hair. I mean, I tied it back most of the time, but I had all these frizzy bits coming off the top and whenever I let the hair down, it went like this [indicates big, bushy frizz]."

"I'm not oblivious to it. It's not like I think I've become more charming or good-looking overnight," he said. "But, no, I haven't lost any respect [for women]. I'm an alright judge of character, so you can figure these things out."
 

Attachments

  • showbiz-elle-magazine-michael-fassbender-cover.jpg
    showbiz-elle-magazine-michael-fassbender-cover.jpg
    325.3 KB · Views: 870
  • showbiz-elle-magazine-michael-fassbender.jpg
    showbiz-elle-magazine-michael-fassbender.jpg
    71.1 KB · Views: 871
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top