I worry about overpopulation. I worry about anyone who texts while driving. However, I do not worry whether studios are campaigning actors as lead or supporting.
Category fraud is a harsh term to describe the fact that Oscar strategists are pushing some actors into unexpected categories, in hopes that it works to their advantage. Theres no reason to worry, though, because voters will be the ultimate arbiters, deciding how they want to define a work.
Equally important, the history of awards is filled with blurred lines, and over the years, most people have stopped questioning it.
Fox campaigned Sigourney Weaver as supporting actress for the 1979 film Alien. Naomi Watts was pushed supporting for Mulholland Drive. Marlon Brando won an Oscar as lead actor for The Godfather, even though his onscreen time was a fraction of Al Pacinos, who was a supporting nominee......
The HFPA is considering The Martian and Joy as comedies. Which means the actors will have an advantage by being considered in the comedy categories rather than the overcrowded drama fields. Outraged? Nah, those movies had some big laughs and happy endings, so they qualify....
So if you admired the work of Vikander, Mara and Tremblay and who didnt? you can vote for them as supporting performances with a clear conscience. Because Oscar history is on your side.