Never said anything was wrong with that. I was just putting out there that you can get designer bags for less that are still in amazing condition pre-loved. The quality is still there AND they are still worth money 20+ years later. My 20-30 year old bags will be around for decades more if I want to keep them or I could sell them and recoup a significant portion of my money and even make money. Nothing like owning and using a designer bag basically for free, or at a profit. Can’t say that about
Coach, MK, RM, TB or the like. Your 06-07 bags would have to be pristine to get more than $50-70 tops, which is harder to do because they don’t wear as well. I have three RMs I picked up as casual bags that are basically brand new (one still had tags on it) that I paid about $20 a piece for. No idea how old they are. Even at a sale price, those owners lost at least 75% of their money.
My point is value. Many designer bags are more affordable than people think and if you want the look for less, there is nothing less than free. And you don’t have to love logos to find one you love. Often the ones without logos are the best deals.
I don’t judge, just giving information. But I feel the judgment from several commenters here. I am far from wealthy and have been dirt poor in the past. I am a very thrifty person to this day. I buy high and low, always second hand or on clearance. Only what I love and what looks good/fits well/is ME, regardless of cost. If I don’t wear it, it is money wasted even if it costs 5 cents. About 90% of what I wear/buy is second hand, 5% gifts and 5% new clearance/sale/outlet ...and I love that. I am 50 years old and am finally at a point where I can have some nicer things or things I really love but I am extremely thrifty. If having a designer bag floats my boat, well then...it is the only thing that I buy designer because it levels up the rest of the outfit and is a focal point.