Okayyyyy lol, I’m doing none of that… *shrugs*
Jennifer Aniston
- Thread starter pursegalsf
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Okayyyyy lol, I’m doing none of that… *shrugs*
But what about it doesn't make sense? She tried IVF, it didn't work, she tried a few things, it didn't work, she doesn't have children.....what about that doesn't make sense?
The timing. If she wanted kids with any of her partners, the technology was available at the time.
With her means, she can have a baby tomorrow if she so desires.
Imho, she is where she wants to be.
It is the last paper edition of Allure, btw.
The end of an era.
Imo, that she continues to discuss “her journey” in public. Google JA and infertility. Seems like an annual topic for her. Also, she is way too old for the victim narrative.
I would think she gets sick of talking about it but she sure still continues to do so.
Rich and famous people have way too much medical and ivf access for her to talk like that- the truth is: it IS OK not to want to have children, sadly despite all the money, ivf can be hard, but there are so many ways to have a child…
Last edited:
We've been over this. The technology wasn't there at the time. In 2012 it stopped being regarded as experimental. Jen was 43 then. Egg freezing is not worthwhile at 43. It was not an option.
Maybe she continued with IVF or other options with other partners - she doesn't really say in the interview. Maybe she felt that the toll IVF was taking on her was too much.
She can have a baby tomorrow -what does this even mean????? She could probably adopt a baby, she could probably have a surrogate - but that's not what she wanted to do. Why is that so hard to understand? Perhaps she feels she would have difficulty connecting with an adopted child, perhaps she has ethical concerns about surrogacy. She's entitled to those perspectives - hence she feels that the option of being children was taken from her.
I've gone down to page 4, and I honestly can't find anything but this article...I remember two others maybe, over the space of 15 years, but certainly not annual.
I don't think the victim narrative is restricted to young people, and I also don't get victim vibes here. It all seems pretty matter of fact.
She is absolutely entitled to those perspectives. Were those discussed by her previously?
I don't recall her discussing them previously. Did she need to? She presumably felt that they weren't right for her.
Agreed, has not ever had to.
Her choice; talk about it, don’t talk about it. Her reproduction choices and issues are not our business; her choice when and what to discuss, or not!
People gonna judge either way
Her choice; talk about it, don’t talk about it. Her reproduction choices and issues are not our business; her choice when and what to discuss, or not!
People gonna judge either way
I hear you @mikimoto007 and the insane fandom of Stu Pitt, yes that was his official nickname from way back because he was constantly fried and did not care who knew. He left a cool chick for a sexy one and now the sexy one wants to bury him in vengeful litigation and at least one of his kids vocally hate him. Oooh yeah, so sexy. How about we have empathy for the kids and women he betrayed instead of hero worship that piece of work.
Girl now,
If she wanted privacy, she will not be discussing those issues in Allure.
It is neither here or there, her choices entirely.
On the one hand, she is putting to light that reproduction matters are serious and don’t wait until you are in your forties as it gets way, way harder.
Here is one from 2021:
Jennifer Aniston on speculation about not having kids: 'You have no clue what's going on'
The actor doesn't pay attention to tabloids these days, but they certainly affected her in the past.
www.today.com
From 2018:
Jennifer Aniston opens up about rumoured fertility battle
The former Friends actress shut down a lot of rumours about private life in a very candid interview with her close friend Molly McNearney
www.mirror.co.uk
