Jennifer Aniston

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Before I asked, she mentioned Justin Theroux, the star of the HBO series “The Leftovers” and her fiancé of more than two years, dropping him into a story about an unappreciated boyfriend who died years later of a brain tumor.
“He was my first love — five years we were together,” she said, referring to that boyfriend. “He would have been the one. But I was 25, and I was stupid. He must have sent me Justin to make up for it all.”
11JPANISTON2-master180.jpg


Ms. Aniston at the 2014 Variety Screening Series in Manhattan last month. Credit Monica Schipper/Getty Images for Variety I took note of her engagement ring, with its gargantuan diamond.
“It’s a rock, I know,” she said, sounding abashed but not really. “He rocked it up. It took me a while to get used to it. I’m not a diamond girl. I’m more Indian jewelry and stuff.” Her outfit wasn’t regal: bluejeans and a black, open-collared shirt.
I noted the din of speculation about why she and Mr. Theroux hadn’t tied the knot yet, and she said they’re still figuring out what kind of ceremony they want. She didn’t volunteer any more detail than necessary.
She bristles at the scrutiny that her private life gets in part because it underscores what she believes to be a double standard, one that came up the night before our interview, when she talked with an audience after a Midtown Manhattan screening of “Cake.”
Continue reading the main story
A woman noted that Ms. Aniston had repeatedly fielded the question of whether she was concerned about the likability of her “Cake” character. “That’s something men don’t get asked,” the woman said.
Ms. Aniston interjected before it was even clear the woman was done.
“They don’t get asked a lot of things,” she said, an unexpected bite in her voice.
During our interview, she elaborated: “You don’t see a lot of men getting asked: ‘Why aren’t you married? Why aren’t you having children?’ You don’t get the ‘Well, they seem to play the same thing over and over again,’ and some of them do.”
“We’re very much a sexist society,” she said. “Women are still not paid as much as men.” Just days earlier, the latest batch of Sony leaks revealed that Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence earned less for “American Hustle” than Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper and Jeremy Renner did.
“I’ve been up against that in negotiations myself,” she said, but declined to be more specific.
And she noted that men’s looks and aging aren’t dissected with the withering judgment directed at, say, Renée Zellweger, when she re-emerged in October with a seemingly changed face.
“There was a big whistle blown out on her, and it was unnecessary,” Ms. Aniston said. “Did she really look that different? Would she walk into a room and you’d say, ‘Who is that?’ That’s Renée, from here on down.” Ms. Aniston made a sweeping motion starting just below her eyes. “You can’t hide those pouty little lips.”
“I really do think you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t,” she added. “You either are too fat — ‘Oh my God, she’s gained weight, getting chubby, mid-40s spread!’ — or ‘She’s so skeletal, get some meat on her bones!’ I’ve been on too-thin lists. I’ve been on what-happened-to-her lists.”
She has in fact churned out movies at an unflagging pace. And while many have been romance-tinged, conventional Hollywood comedies, she has routinely built in exceptions. She was the femme fatale to Clive Owens’s patsy in “Derailed” (2005). She tucked herself into one of the director Nicole Holofcener’s idiosyncratic ensembles in “Friends With Money” (2006). Most notably, she played a Texas dime-store clerk trapped in a mirthless marriage in “The Good Girl,” a tiny 2002 drama for which she got rave reviews. But the movie quickly faded from memory.
She’s hoping for more from “Cake.”
When the screenplay for it circulated through Hollywood in 2013, she was one of many actresses to lobby for the lead, which she got only after it was turned down by someone else. Neither she nor Mr. Barnz would say whom.
11JPANISTON4-articleLarge.jpg


Ms. Aniston with Jake Gyllenhaal in the 2002 independent film “The Good Girl.” Credit Dale Robinette/Fox Searchlight Mr. Barnz saw her “Cake” change of pace less as a physical transformation along the lines of Charlize Theron’s in “Monster” or Matthew McConaughey’s in “Dallas Buyers Club” than as a tonal departure like Mary Tyler Moore’s in “Ordinary People.”
Ms. Aniston’s commitment to the project was instant and complete, he said.
Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main story
“She attached herself with zero financing on board,” he said. “You’d think that actors would do that for projects that they love all the time, but it’s not true. Their representatives get nervous: If the project doesn’t then get financing, it’s a reflection of their client.”
To play the part, Ms. Aniston stopped exercising, gained weight, let her hair get dirty and didn’t wear makeup. All of that is actually less striking on screen than her sluggish, herky-jerky movements, a manifestation of the character’s ambiguously defined physical injuries and reliance on narcotics.
One resource for understanding her character’s experience was a close friend, Stacy Courtney, who has also worked as her stunt double. One of Courtney’s legs was mangled by a boat propeller years ago, and afterward she endured nearly a dozen surgeries and a grueling regimen of physical therapy.
In their conversations, Ms. Courtney said, the actress was “really breaking it down and wanting to know: What did it feel like to be that woman, to be in that kind of pain? She really wanted to be inside my body.”
The “Cake” shoot spanned only about a month. Ms. Aniston’s exertions to ensure that the movie is noticed — that nothing about it or her work is “hidden” — have lasted much longer.
And the nervousness that trailed her to Toronto is gone, replaced by pure resolve.
Fussing with her microphone at that Midtown Manhattan screening, she said: “I’m afraid that I’m not going to be loud enough.” So she spoke up. And everyone heard her just fine.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/m...ething-to-prove-with-cake.html?_r=1&referrer=
 
^ well, it's ALL about Jen, isn't it?

What is? The thread bearing her name or the interview about her? lol! Yea, I think it's supposed to be all about her :)

BTW, she never called the guy her soulmate, he was her first love. I'm sure my DH was someones and I know I had one too. It's not that big a deal. I mean, unless someone makes it one.

I can't figure out why she's so polarizing. . . if she wears a white tee and glasses and walks into a building it's a big deal. So odd.
 
well, so much for that ploy-

The widow of the man Jennifer Aniston recently described as the first true love of her life slammed the actress for using her late husband as a publicity tool.

"He was my first love — five years we were together," Aniston recently said of Daniel McDonald, who passed away from brain cancer in 2007. "He would have been the one! But I was 25, and I was stupid." McDonald went on to marry actress and filmmaker Mujah Muraini-Melehi after his relationship with Aniston ended.

However, it seems McDonald's widow isn't happy with the fact that Aniston is throwing his name around in interviews. Muraini-Melehi posted about the recent flood of attention to her Facebook page. Redbook reports:

Mujah told Inside Edition, "Daniel and Jennifer had a relationship over 20 years ago, when they were both still very young. She made a life choice, but so did he. I am sorry that Jennifer did not realize the treasure that was Daniel when she had the chance, long before he and I met and long before he died. It pains me to read the headlines that allude to her losing him tragically when in fact she was not present during his long and difficult illness. Perhaps Daniel's gift was to teach her how to love, and to appreciate what she has with Justin Theroux."
"After Daniel died, I reached out to her to give her back all the photographs from the time they were together," she wrote. I never got an answer back from her."


http://jezebel.com/widow-of-jen-anistons-first-love-you-werent-there-for-1679592021


Yawn. What a non-issue/story...:sneaky:
 
I don't disagree with you and it is one of the very few times I think Jen has said something that didn't make a whole lot of sense when I heard he was sick after their relationship and he was married to someone else. I don't think what she said was in good taste. Hence I don't think she said it to get an Oscar???? Better had she not said it at all.

I didn't say she was good at her campaign.

edited to add - i guess we'll find out tmw ^
 
I agree. . . a non-story. Much ado about nothing really.


The widow complaining about the media:
I am very upset that the media is exploiting Daniel’s memory in connection to Jennifer Aniston.
...............
My heart aches to see our tragedy of losing Daniel to serve the media’s hunger for sensationalism. I remember how journalists often called our home to ask Daniel for information about Jennifer
..........

I am sorry that Jennifer did not realize the treasure that was Daniel when she had the chance, long before he and I met and long before he died. It pains me to read the headlines that allude to her losing him tragically when she was not present during his long and difficult illness.
 
I agree. . . a non-story. Much ado about nothing really.


The widow complaining about the media:


and also complaining about jennifer aniston

She then goes after Aniston, saying; 'Why now? I wonder. After decades of stardom, she is media savvy enough to know that any casual comment she makes becomes front page tabloid news. Jennifer Aniston is Jennifer Aniston, and that means that anything that she says about her love life to any journalist, even someone as reputable as New York Times’ Frank Bruni, will be later dissected and exploited.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-revealing-not-present-difficult-illness.html
 
Because I guess after all the press junkets it's hard to always know exactly which little sentence will be sensationalized and blown up. It's really not a major conversation or comment she made.
 
Because I guess after all the press junkets it's hard to always know exactly which little sentence will be sensationalized and blown up. It's really not a major conversation or comment she made.


please, she can't cut four inches off her hair without the world spazzing about it and she knows it. she could not possibly think she was going to drop that into an interview and somehow the world would abstain from figuring out who that was and contacting his widow.
 
"After Daniel died, I reached out to her to give her back all the photographs from the time they were together," she wrote. I never got an answer back from her."

http://jezebel.com/widow-of-jen-anistons-first-love-you-werent-there-for-1679592021
Oh dear, I guess he wasn't her soul mate after all, but I bet the widow would have had some warm fuzzies, if Aniston accepted the photographs, showing that she cared abut the dead husband. Even if she's just being polite.

I agree with you, I don't know why she used that tidbit… she doesn't need to. Everyone likes her. Most people have such affection for her. She didn't need to throw out that suggestion of a dead soul mate.
 
A member here used the term soul mate, not Aniston. The spouse and the media made it a big deal.
How do we know Jennifer's handlers even communicated it to her that the widow reached out?
I think its a little odd it's a big deal to anyone, lol! Plenty of celebs comment about their first love, it's really not a big deal.
 
http://www.justjared.com/2015/01/14/jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms/

Jennifer Aniston looks super chic while showing off a tiny bit of midriff on the red carpet at the premiere of Cake on Wednesday (January 14) at ArcLight Cinemas in Hollywood.

The 45-year-old actress was joined at the event by her co-stars Chris Messina and Camille Guaty.

The nominations for the 2015 Oscars are going to be announced in the morning and Jennifer is predicted to be nominated for Best Actress for her work in the movie.

Jen has received nominations from the Golden Globes, the SAG Awards, and the Critics Choice Movie Awards, so the chances are high of being recognized by the Oscar committee as well!
 

Attachments

  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-01.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-01.jpg
    200.5 KB · Views: 712
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-02.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-02.jpg
    238.2 KB · Views: 547
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-05.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-05.jpg
    189 KB · Views: 561
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-13.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-13.jpg
    267.1 KB · Views: 541
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-18.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-18.jpg
    129 KB · Views: 625
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-15.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-15.jpg
    197.8 KB · Views: 630
  • jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-21.jpg
    jennifer-aniston-premieres-cake-while-waiting-for-oscar-noms-21.jpg
    190.5 KB · Views: 555
I normally find Jen amiable and harmless but whatever this is, it's out there and has started since "Cake" - I'm starting to smell a bit of desperation for the Oscars. I mean, really.

It's almost as annoying as Anne Hathaway's Academy campaign for Les Mis. I thought the GG's were ok for her, aside from the horrible spot with Cumby. And afterwards was funny.

For some reason, this is starting to get under my skin a little. Maybe I need a disco nap and a mojito.:drinkup:
 
Last edited:
Top