Jennifer Aniston

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

^ I do know someone who has a longstanding relationship with famous people, PR, magazines and photographers. That's why I always pay attention to the narrative that is written for certain celebs. Its fun to watch how they leverage something when there’s a commodity to move and sell.
 
Of course her publicist could declare no questions about Pitt or Jolie but if I was on her team I'd advise against that strategy because when the info inevitably leaks, and it always does, her refusal to even talk about them becomes the new story in itself (she's a diva! petty! still traumatized! etc etc etc).
 
I've not read or head her speak of Pitt in eons, but oddly he manages to bring her up when he has a movie to promote. He just did it again during a bit in "Between Two Ferns," promoting whatever new war movie he has now. Same old shtick: Jen, Clooney and I love being a Dad.

So who needs who to stay relevant? 😄

Do you have a link to this? Wanna see him talk abt Jen, Clooney & being a dad ☺
 
Completely agree -- including the part about being a media darling with Friends… but the challenge, once the show is over, is to stay relevant. Just being cute, with good hair, isn't enough and she wasn't making good movies that people flocked to…

JA’s career is a business and as I’ve said many times, she has the best and most hardworking publicist in the business… Stephen Huvane.

Everything he does is calculated, because he needs her to stay relevant, post Brad split and post TV ending. Babies and engagements, that’s his go-to, at the moment. He wrote the narrative for her, but she agreed to it, of course.

I believe Huvane works closely with People mag, and they orchestra the covers when she has a movie to promote. The "Jen moving on after Brad" one comes to mind, so does the "5 years after Brad" when she was promoting something with Gerard Butler, and the "Jen's hot new man" (referring to Paul Sculfor) and the Vogue interview she did talking about Angie, and so on and forth. Nobody recalls seeing Heidi Bivens doing the same... :smile1:
 
I'm sorry, why are so many personal attack posts being allowed through when my barely mentioned question was edited. Are the moderators allowing some people leeway and not others? If all the posts on the last few pages were not bashing each other directly than I don't know what is. I am just VERY confused as to what constitutes acceptable bashing others and what doesn't if all these posts are allowed?
 
I believe Huvane works closely with People mag, and they orchestra the covers when she has a movie to promote. The "Jen moving on after Brad" one comes to mind, so does the "5 years after Brad" when she was promoting something with Gerard Butler, and the "Jen's hot new man" (referring to Paul Sculfor) and the Vogue interview she did talking about Angie, and so on and forth. Nobody recalls seeing Heidi Bivens doing the same… :smile1:
Exactly. Some of those PR people are worth every penny the celebs pay them. :D
 
Last edited:
I am calm :) It's not like my post was that long- I know there isn't anyone on here that is the post length police :) I really am curious for all of those that defend or see it as making the best out of bad situation, have you or a loved one had a spouse cheat on you. Is that how you are able to dismiss it so easily. I think Jen showed a huge amount of class. It is awful to be cheated on by someone who is suppose to love you let alone have it all play out in the media. As far as her not stopping the questions, Jen did a talk show shortly after their split and 2 of her friends joined her for support. It was made clear no questions on that subject. The interviewer Still went there and the friends of Jen were not happy. Lastly it is amazing to me how some of you seem to have Steve Huvane on speed dial. :) It's as if you know his every move!!!!

And yet Jen broke up a 14 year relationship, too. My main point I was trying to make was that Jennifer rode a huge wave of sympathy back then, and still does to a small extent. Mainly to keep her in the public eye as her movies aren't much. Yet, Heidi is not famous, neither was she part of Hollywood's "Golden Couple" nor was she "America's favorite Friend" as Aniston had the image of. I think that's why she and Justin getting together, and her being a homewrecker in turn is omitted entirely from the public eye as it's "Jen" who may be at fault. There are parallels between the relationships. And Brad and (mostly) Angelina were villified (because she was unconventional, had the vials, kissed her brother, was known for being eccentric etc) and called every name in the book, Justin and Jen are "so cute together." She has her public image to thank for this, and for that, her publicist and the "poor Jen" persona.
 
Jen did a segment on this show and didn't say squat about him. He managed to work her into his segment and like others have said here, Brad most likely had control over what the content of the bit would include. Soooo?? ��

lol. He didn't say squat about her either.

My point will always be this about Aniston and her PR machine. If she wanted to stop talking about her uterus (or her hair lol) for the last 20 years she could certainly do so. Publicists shut ish down all the time. That is their job. And she has one of the best. Lolita Grande has been around for 5 mintues and this little wretch is already telling everyone what she will not discuss.
 
Top