Isabel Marant Boots thread!

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

These are soooo cute! I want them in bronze.

I was totally tempted by the bronze, but since my wardrobe is dominated by blacks, grays, and navy, I decided black was more practical! :p I love that these have the same shape as her boots from previous seasons, but without the fringe and tassel-y doodads. Though I do have a similar IM boot from 4 years ago (forget the style name) with cute fringe down the sides….this time I wanted something simpler and plainer! These are so chic!
 
I was totally tempted by the bronze, but since my wardrobe is dominated by blacks, grays, and navy, I decided black was more practical! :p I love that these have the same shape as her boots from previous seasons, but without the fringe and tassel-y doodads. Though I do have a similar IM boot from 4 years ago (forget the style name) with cute fringe down the sides….this time I wanted something simpler and plainer! These are so chic!


You make a good point. The black are definitely more chic. I just wish they were so pricey.
 
You make a good point. The black are definitely more chic. I just wish they were so pricey.

I'm with you, girl! But I'm trying to focus less on the dollar price and more on the cost per wear! ;) They're simple and somewhat classic and go with everything!

cute boots let me know how it fit. im looking for a pair of booties to match my boy bag too.

Will do! The Andrews would look amazing with a boy bag! :tup:
 
Just orderes these, and I'm so excided!! It's funny that Mytheresa says they are small to size and NAP says they are large to size. Who knows.. :))

457720_in_xl.jpg

Also, I noticed that MyTheresa had the same model with slightly different colour of the heel. Do you this they are the same, or which one do you prefer?

P00109122--DETAIL_2.jpg
 
I would say the difference in the heels is down to the photograph. Regarding size, I spoke to a stylist at Matches who said all IM shoes are either true to size or running slightly larger this season, I was asking about the Aubrey boot which she said was coming up slightly large.
 
I received my Andrew boots and although they're lovely, they just don't have that "oomph" that I was hoping they'd have. I'll be sending them back. But for those looking for a simple, slouchy-cool look that is minimalist and effortless, it may be a good choice.

As for fit, I'd say they are TTS. I feel they are generally consistent with other IM boots from seasons past in terms of width and length….maybe a tad bit narrower than past seasons (not good for wider-footed gals like me). Some vendor websites describe the Andrew is being large-to-size, but I didn't see it that way.
 
I received my Andrew boots and although they're lovely, they just don't have that "oomph" that I was hoping they'd have. I'll be sending them back. But for those looking for a simple, slouchy-cool look that is minimalist and effortless, it may be a good choice.

As for fit, I'd say they are TTS. I feel they are generally consistent with other IM boots from seasons past in terms of width and length….maybe a tad bit narrower than past seasons (not good for wider-footed gals like me). Some vendor websites describe the Andrew is being large-to-size, but I didn't see it that way.

Oh no, I'm sorry to hear this. What makes them look so chic in photos? I also have a slightly wider foot, so these are probably a no-go for me too. :(
 
Oh no, I'm sorry to hear this. What makes them look so chic in photos? I also have a slightly wider foot, so these are probably a no-go for me too. :(

Hi Saira! They do look chic in the photos, and I'd say the photos are an accurate representation of what they look like IRL. But you never really know if you'll *love* them until you try them on, KWIM? And at this price point, it's gotta be crazy outta control LOOOOVE!!! :smile1: As for the width, there's a little folded part in the suede right at the widest part of the foot, which means that part probably won't stretch much. So I'd say the Andrew is better suited for people with narrow to average width feet.
 
I received my Andrew boots and although they're lovely, they just don't have that "oomph" that I was hoping they'd have. I'll be sending them back. But for those looking for a simple, slouchy-cool look that is minimalist and effortless, it may be a good choice.

As for fit, I'd say they are TTS. I feel they are generally consistent with other IM boots from seasons past in terms of width and length….maybe a tad bit narrower than past seasons (not good for wider-footed gals like me). Some vendor websites describe the Andrew is being large-to-size, but I didn't see it that way.

My Aubreys arrived and I'm also returning as I wasn't taken with them. Think they are true to size and not on the large side, as the stylist at Matches suggested they would be. I've seen the Andrews and fully agree with you, a lovely boot but lacking something!!
 
My Aubreys arrived and I'm also returning as I wasn't taken with them. Think they are true to size and not on the large side, as the stylist at Matches suggested they would be. I've seen the Andrews and fully agree with you, a lovely boot but lacking something!!

Sorry to hear it wasn't love. The Aubreys are so rock-and-roll yet feminine, but it's a big look. Good call to send back if it doesn't feel right!
 
Hi, just wondering if anyone knows what the difference is between the "Black" and "Anthracite" IM Dickers aside from the bottom layer of the heel? Matchesfashion currently have them both on there:

http://www.matchesfashion.com/womens/isabel-marant

Anthracite is a dark charcoal grey but not jet black. Black is black. I prefer the anthracite, I like that it goes with a black outfit but its not black, if that makes sense to you. I hope you can see them in person side by side, I think it is easier to make a decision that way.:flowers:
 
Top