Interesting quote from a paragraph in the story. "We continued to be disappointed by our performance in North America, which was impacted by substantially lower traffic in our stores and by our decision to limit access to our e-factory flash sales site, Luis said.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/maggiem...n-earnings-miss-north-american-sales-decline/
As someone who was one of the first to be locked out of FOS (and still not in), part of me is thinking "Ha - that's what you get". It's important for the leadership of the company to understand the significant impact of customer retention. Coach used to be my #1 brand and I spent a large portion of my disposable income on Coach. Since the sour feeling of being "locked out" (apparently for buying too many bags), I've turned my attention (and my $$) to Dooney, MK, Kate Spade, Tory Burch, and others. I don't love handbags any less, I just love Coach a lot less. Since I don't have unlimited funds to spend on my obsession, Coach will continue to get less "share of wallet" from me. Coach's competition is real and the brand won't survive if the women's handbag line doesn't succeed and grow - shoes/wearables/mens just won't carry it. As a public company, analysts and shareholders won't respond lightly to decisions that result in missed performance targets so interested to see how they plan to turn this decline around.