The mri isnt only to check for tears. Its to check for other conditions like capsular contraction etc. Its also used to find indicators of ALS, which is a rare form of cancer which the tear drops have been known to increase the risk of. I have a tear drop implant too btw. Unfortunately at the time of me getting my breast done, the studies relating to anatomical implant and als have yet to be released thus surgeons had deemed it safe. Eventually I will replace it with motiva.Dear @K Couture , thanks a lot for the feedback. Yes, mine was teardrop mentor.
The MRI shows no tear on the implant actually. I'm just worried since the itches on my breast and my surgeon said it needed to be replaced after 7-8 years. I think he only said it for commercially reason, but I'm also aware of the BII since I learned that BII can happen even though no tear on the implant.
I'll examine my symptoms carefully to make sure for now, until I can find a good surgeon to do the fat transfer locally or can find a chance to go to UK![]()
Problem with Fat graft to the breast is unless you naturally have volumous breast and just want to create natural cleavage or contour the shape, its fine. Other than that, you will find lots of dissatisfaction with it as the resorption is quite high when fg is used and results are not good. 1/2-1cup bigger is what you can expect and even then you dont know how long it will last. Theres's several reasons for this.
1) You need at least 400 cc of fat available. 200 each side. Thats quite a lot of fat btw for asian women. Many of us dont have anywhere near the sufficient amount to harvest
2) When such a large volume off fat is transplanted into the one region, it means there is less room for new blood vessels for the fat cells to develop into the transplanted area. This is why it dies off so easily.
So unless you are a bigger girl (and i dont mean asian big), you might want to look into motiva instead.
Also, i would advise NOT going to thailand for plastic surgery. I have investments in the thai surgical industry and i myself know better than to do any procedures there. I'll give you an example. During one of my meetings with a group of senior surgeons, I brought up the use of endoscope during breast augmentation procedures. All of them just laughed it off and admitted to charging a higher price for the endoscopic technique to patients WITHOUT actually performing the endoscopic technique. This means patients are paying a premium for procedures which they are not even having. They even explained that the patients wont know the difference and even went on to justify that even if the endoscopic method is used, the surgeon still needs to physically reach in to make the incisions and that the endoscope is just for visual advantages. This is incorrect as I have witnessed an endosopic breast augmentation performed in Korea whereby the surgeon actually splits the breast tissue layer by layer with a fine fiber laser so as to create the breast pocket between the muscles. Fact is, thai surgeons are not adept in using the endoscopic method. I hope this gives you something to think about when considering Thailand. The industry is very shadey there.
Last edited: