I'm curious to see how you feel about diamonds in the K through M color range? Is it just enough tint of pale yellow to appear "bought and done on purpose" or do they just look like dirty diamonds?
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I LOVE them in older cuts!
Here's a great thread already on this subject that has some STUNNING photos. http://forum.purseblog.com/the-jewelry-box/show-me-your-low-colored-diamonds-491431.html
I think they are awesome in the older style cuts and in cushions, though in a modern regular round they are not my favorite. I don't know that I'd say on purpose for a regular RB, but I would for an older style cut.
I personally would not like that. It would have to be more like an X-Z to be appealing in that shape to me. But this isn't MY stone, so don't let my opinion change your decisions.What about in a pear shape?
I love them if they are bought purposely low and appear that way. I can see where you don't want it to seem like you didn't purposely buy a low diamond hoping it would be whiter. So I think I'd like the L and M over a K. K would be too borderline maybe trying to be white. And I'd prefer it without fluorescence to purposely not hide the yellow. And to really bring that out I'd stay away from white metals and stick with yellow gold or a nice rose gold. To really make it say "I know it's yellow and I love it!"... Especially in a nice intricate setting... Yummy.
And like ame said, best in chunkier cut older stones.
I always thought they looked a little too white.
I have some white diamonds, but I prefer the low-color - amazing fire, like carrying around a bubbling glass of champagne.
A K will not be AS post it as an M. I think if you want a definite yellow go M or lower actually. But the SI2 isn't appealing to me at all.