not great customer service seems to be the most appropriate phrase to use.
With all due respect to SAs , whether the A stands for 'associate', 'assistant' or 'advisor', selling goods in a shop is not a profession.
Therefore in their defence they cannot be accused of being unprofessional.
English is not my first language, so please correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t a “profession” a paid occupation, especially one that involves some form of training? I have worked in Designer retail before and these types of jobs require many hours of initial training and several follow up courses throughout the year for further development and higher tier promotions. Not only Training courses in leather but customer service relations as well. I’m not knocking anyone working in “regular” retail but there is a huge difference in quotas and expectations when it comes to dealing with celebrities, NDAs, millionaires etc. I believe the English definition of “profession”, is any vocation or business, or trade: an occupation by which a person earns a living; work; business.
“Unprofessional”, is defined as a variance with or contrary to
professional standards or ethics; not befitting members of a profession, as language, behavior, or conduct, not done with
professional competence (having suitable or sufficient skill, knowledge, experience). In my opinion, the lack of communication or more importantly, MISCOMMUNICATION, between the SA and the SM or even the floor manager was a disservice (in the form of being unintentionally unkind) to this client. When it comes to B and K’s, clients don’t mess around. It can truly be heartbreaking to some clients, while others are like, “Whatever”. I feel bad for both this client and SA. I truly hope this was a one time occurrence and a learning lesson for all involved. IMO, the only way this H Boutique can show this client just how valuable she truly is to this store is to make it up to her by having the SA apologize to her for the misunderstanding and assure her they will make it right, some way, some how. Of course, the SM has to be onboard with this and having the SM apologize as well wouldn’t hurt. This does speak volumes about this particular H establishment and the ranking among this SA and this client. From my experience (after I was promoted to LSA) I had first choice when a limited or hot item came to our store. That item was then “suppose to be” offered to clients based on their ranking and standing with our store. If the item was rejected by our VVIPs, it would be offered to VIPs and in theory, it would be offered to regular clients after that, but it never made it that far. The reason I said “suppose to be” is because that was generally the rule for a lead sales associate but once I made floor manager, it was at my discretion to offer that hot item to any one of my loyal clients, whether they spent only $5000 a year or $60,000 a year, it was totally up to me which client I selected. Once I made store manager, I was less in sales and more in ordering merchandise and scheduling. It was then up to me which of my LSA would get that particular hot item to offer to their clients. SM jobs are very stressful and having an SA jumping the gun and offering clients items already promised to another LSA or client makes that job more difficult. There is definitely a chain of command and ranks among high end designer boutiques like H.