I respectfully disagree. And I know this may be an unpopular opinion, please take it with a grain of salt. There are people willing to buy at such high cost from resellers is because there is a significant discrepancy between the supply and demand. The only way to curtail that would be for Hermes to produce more BKCs. If there were that many in the market, then the resellers would simply be out of business. But that's not the Hermes business model of exclusivity, which also produces more demand. It's a bit unfair imo to blame the customers who can't easily get what they want (who's to say someone deserve a BKC more than others - you can even say loyal customers deserve it more but there has to be a fairness in barrier to entry, but right now with the short supply there is a HUGE barrier to entry), and as much as I hate to say it (and note that I am not a supporter of resellers, nor have I ever purchased a handbag from a reseller) it's simply a market opportunity for resellers - and it's also slightly unfair to call them greedy as they're simply just opportunists as any other professionals that are utilizes their skills and resources to move to survive/thrive in life.
But also back to topic... it really sucks that some people are able to engage in this behavior. Even asides from legality, this does punish the real customers who might otherwise have a chance at a BKC. :/
This is well thought out reasoning of the current state of affairs and is not the disagreement that the first sentence suggests.
It is the simple (simplistic?) idea that if nobody bought from resellers they would not exist, that fixxi disagrees with - probably because the market is such that it would not happen.
I share the view that 'flipping' resellers should not be supported - whatever the justification.
Nonetheless I cannot disagree that from an entrepreneurial point of view they cannot be criticised for capitalising on a market opportunity.