Harry and Meghan Appreciation Thread

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I just want to thank you @djuna1 and @Morgan R for your posts. They give me hope in this time of constant divisive rhetoric and rage bait. I am agnostic about MM but I am a fan of you! :heart:
Thank You.

I've paid attention to Meghan before she was with Harry because I did watch Suits (USA Network has always had some great shows but not everybody has been aware of that because it isn't a main network). With Harry I have always found him the most interesting member of the royal family aside from his mother Diana so I have always paid attention to the work he has done.

I don't pay attention to the British Media because they have always written horrible about the royals that aren't the heirs. Have Harry and Meghan done everything right no but then again no one has but I'm not going criticize everything they do. I'm that way with any public figure if I'm interested in what they do I pay attention to them if I don't care about the public figure I don't pay attention to what they do.
 
Last edited:
Updates regarding security for Harry and Meghan


The UK security:







The New York (US) security. Their security will be upgraded when they visit New York.:




Now, however, it has emerged in the judgement that the NYPD found that the chase in May really did happen, and has concluded that the behavior of the paparazzi chasing Harry and Meghan was not just “reckless” but also “persistently dangerous.”

In what is likely to be a sweet vindication for Harry and Meghan, a senior officer at the NYPD has said the city not only holds enough evidence to arrest two people for reckless endangerment, but has also upgraded its security protocol for visits by Prince Harry and Meghan following the incident last May.

In a letter to the Metropolitan Police in London dated Dec. 6 2023, the NYPD’s Chief of Intelligence discussed “certain changes to the security posture that will be afforded to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex” following a “thorough review” of the incident.

The intelligence chief wrote: “We found the following: reckless disregard of vehicle and traffic laws and persistently dangerous and unacceptable behavior on the part of the paparazzi during the night in question.

“The individuals operated vehicles, scooters, and bicycles in a manner that forced the security team, which included an NYPD Lead Car, to take evasive actions on several occasions and a circuitous route to avoid being struck by pursuing vehicles or trapped on side blocks.

“Our conclusion, upon review with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, is that we have sufficient evidence to arrest two individuals for reckless endangerment.”

The intelligence briefing was published Wednesday in the judgement in the lawsuit Prince Harry was bringing against the British Government over his security provisions in the U.K.

While the NYPD has yet to actually arrest anyone in connection with the incident, there has been an immediate upgrade in the security extended to Prince Harry and Meghan when they visit New York in the future, according to the officer.
 
Tumblr
GHkPmBVXsAAcQcz
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: a_b_c and Morgan R

Meghan Markle Is Teaming Up With Geena Davis to Change Our Perceptions of Moms on TV​

On Thursday, the Duchess of Sussex and the nonprofit Moms First are announcing the results of a study on television moms with the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media.

BY ERIN VANDERHOOF

Before anyone knew her as the Duchess of Sussex, Suits fans knew Meghan Markle for her role as Rachel Zane, the USA Network show’s wry and intelligent fan-favorite paralegal. Mirroring Meghan’s 2018 trip down the aisle and pivot to philanthropy, Rachel’s storyline over seven seasons also ended with a wedding and a big job in a new city. Now a mother of two, Meghan is setting her sights on the next phase of life as it appears on the small screen. The duchess is teaming up with actor Geena Davis and Moms First, a longtime charity partner of the Archewell Foundation, to raise awareness about the ways television depicts characters who are mothers, backed up by data gathered from programming across 2022.

On Thursday, Moms First and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media shared the results of a study that shows how those portrayals don’t always reflect reality, and argues that a change is necessary if we want to shift public attitudes and policy. The study, funded by the Archewell Foundation, found that though TV moms have become slightly more diverse, they are still underrepresented as earners and are still largely young, white, and thin. In 2022, when a couple with kids under 18 had a clear breadwinner, they were male 86.5% of the time. The study found that childcare and the realities of keeping a house running are largely erased.

In an interview with Vanity Fair, Davis says she was surprised by how “dated” the various portrayals of TV moms seemed. “The representation of motherhood seemed like such a throwback,” she says. “It didn’t reflect modern reality anywhere near as closely as I had hoped or imagined.”

In a statement, Meghan explained her reasoning for signing on to the project. “My past experience as an actress, and now today as a producer and mother, have amplified my belief in the critical importance of supporting women and moms both behind the lens and in front of it,” she said. “This report about the portrayal of mothers in entertainment highlights the gaps we need to fill to achieve true representation in the content we create and consume, and I’m honored to support this work through the Archewell Foundation.”

Davis has been working on issues of women’s representation since she founded the institute in 2004, based on the idea that presenting producers and film executives with the numbers about gender disparity in media could lead to tangible change. “Images have a profound impact on people’s perceptions of themselves and others, and therefore the images can be used to create good,” she says. “I saw that children’s movies and TV made specifically for kids seemed to have a huge gender disparity…. What if we’re training kids from the beginning to have unconscious gender bias by showing boys as more important and taking up more space in the world?”

In the past, the institute has looked at subjects including diversity in media, gender stereotypes onscreen, and the industry’s approach to mental health, and the results of the institute’s studies have had an effect on industry opinions. But for their look into TV motherhood, they teamed up with Moms First to aim for an even broader impact. When founder and CEO Reshma Saujani founded the charity as the “Marshall Plan for Moms” in 2021, Archewell signed on as an early donor. Since then, the organization has been lobbying to pass paid leave policies and push for reform to the nation’s broken childcare system.

“Building Moms First came out of the pandemic and really seeing millions of women getting pushed out of their workforce because we live in a country that didn’t allow mothers to be both mothers and workers,” Saujani says. Her previous experience as the founder of Girls Who Code helped her realize that changing the role of women in a given field is about providing opportunity along with changing hearts and minds. “For me it was about, ‘What is the impact on culture?’ If you don’t value something, you don’t respect it, and you don’t invest in it. When I looked at TV, it’s like you didn’t see images that really accurately reflected motherhood in pop culture.”

The report notes that only 15% of TV parents are ever shown doing domestic work like cooking or cleaning. Still, less than 10% of TV parents had a messy house. Saujani says that only seeing images of perfect houses without any of the labor that keeps a home running can help feed feelings of “mom guilt” and fuel a gendered imbalance in housework. Davis adds that these informal taboos can also limit the imaginations of the people who make TV. “We’re not at all saying, ‘Hey, portray mothers better by making them seem even more perfect.’ What we’re saying is they’re leaving out realities of motherhood—the difficulties and the challenges,” she says.

Davis says her advocacy work came out of her experience playing Thelma in 1991’s Thelma & Louise and watching the film become a cult classic. “I had really wanted to be in the movie because I thought they were great characters, but I wasn’t prepared for the reaction that it had,” she says. “Suddenly people wanted to tell me how the movie impacted them.” The characters are complicated, but they were nevertheless important and meaningful to the audience. “It made me suddenly realize that we don’t give women [empowering films]. It’s very rare to give women the experience of being able to identify with the female characters and live vicariously through a female character.”

Davis mentioned that she hasn’t had the chance to catch the duchess’s role in Suits, but she is thankful for the support from the Archewell Foundation. “We love having her support and the support of Archwell,” Davis says. “We can’t do it without financial support like that, and it’s obviously a subject that’s very near and dear to her heart.”

Saujani thanked Meghan for the work she has done since the pandemic to support the charity and make issues like paid leave a central part of her platform. “She had a line she would say, and I always steal it from her: The most important title I have is mother,” Saujani says. “The one ask is to show our multidimensionality. Show us both as moms and workers, don’t just show one or the other. Show us as we are: both.”

vanityfair.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: a_b_c and limom
Meghan taking part of the SXSW panel “Breaking Barriers, Shaping Narratives: How Women Lead On and Off the Screen”


Harry was in the audience



72899869007-20240308-sxsw-jwj-02187.jpg
32BEEA1F-C831-46ED-B1A6-AFC953753418-copy-333x500@2x.jpg
72899863007-20240308-sxsw-jwj-02206.jpg
20240308_144448.jpg20240308_134945.jpg20240308_143320.jpg
2680A905-DDDB-468D-BD77-F4B4F186F0E3_1_201_a-1140x780@2x.jpeg
20240308_16174.png
20240308_135144.jpg20240308_144455.jpg
 
Last edited:
Visiting The Archewell Foundation’s San Antonio Welcome Project which supports the creation of programming for women who have recently resettled from Afghanistan



20240309_100454.jpg20240309_100117.jpgTS2_9246-1037x691@2x.jpgTS1_9401-461x691@2x.jpg20240309_095955.jpg20240309_100544.jpg
 
A US court has dismissed a defamation case brought against the Duchess of Sussex by her half-sister.

Samantha Markle had taken legal action against Meghan Markle over comments she made to Oprah Winfrey and on her Netflix show, Harry And Meghan.

However, she will not be able to refile the case, after Florida judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell dismissed it with prejudice.

The judge, ruling in favour of the former Suits actress, said in a 58-page decision that the plaintiff had “failed to identify any statements that could support a claim for defamation or defamation-by-implication”.

Meghan’s lawyer Michael J Kump, said: “We are pleased with the court’s ruling dismissing the case.”

Samantha Markle, who has the same father as Meghan, claimed the couple’s comments during the high-profile tell-all interview with Winfrey in 2021 were “demonstrably false and malicious lies”.

The duchess said to Oprah that she grew up as an only child, also saying her sister changed her surname back to Markle after she began a relationship with Harry.

The judge said Meghan’s statements could not be defamatory because they were either an opinion, “substantially true based on judicially noticed evidence”, or “not capable of being considered defamatory”.

She went on: “That Plaintiff used one last name and then the name Markle soon after reports of Defendant’s relationship with Prince Harry were published is substantially true, based on the exhibits in the record, of which the Court has taken judicial notice, and the Court cannot reasonably infer otherwise.”

Samantha Markle first brought a defamation case against her younger sister in March 2022, alleging the duchess had defamed her by giving information to an unauthorised biography called Finding Freedom and by discussing their relationship with Winfrey on live television.

Judge Honeywell found the duchess could not be liable for the contents of the book because she did not publish it, and dismissed the case.

Meghan has not spoken to her half-sister for years.

 
Top