A can of worms indeed. It always amazes me that there are some who relish the thought of "fake", "travel", "replica", "so I don't have to wear my good jewelry", which to me, in most cases, is just an excuse to wear large stones or pieces that you otherwise don't want to, or, cannot afford to spend the money on. Which by the way, I do not pass judgment on ever.
Then the conversation turns to the same objective with Hermes, and all h#ll breaks loose. In that discussion, the nay-sayers always jump on their "Hermes Saddle" and claim slave labor, shady dealings, etc. Yet, what do you think transpires with fake jewelry? Integrity? An honest alternative??? Surely, not. Yet, with those sporting Hermes avitars, it's completely acceptable, while someone who feels it is more prudent to invest money in real jewelry and carry a "fake", "travel", or, "replica so I don't have to take my real Hermes to the ____________" is villified. Seems like a big contradiction to me.
I don't condone the conditions that apply to the manufacturing of these items, no one with a conscience would. But don't kid yourself to preach that these types of working conditions don't apply to some aspect in the manufacturing process of "authentic" luxury goods as well. Sadly, that's the reality in this world whether you consider for example the fact that supporting luxury brands that are foreign made takes jobs and opportunities away from American designers and manufacturers. Or, consider the the potential for the socially immoral and emotional toll taken on women who feel the only way to happiness and acceptance is to own these brands at whatever the cost.
Again, I don't not pass judgement, on anyone, either way. In the end, they are just material goods, meant to be used and enjoyed. I, personally do not own any replicas, jewelry nor bags, but I would never discount the opportunity if it was what I wanted.