I think there's a split of opinions, at least amongst the CL collectors, some are pro DIY strassing and others aren't so much.
1. Some people try to get an "inspired" look for obviously less cost than if you were to purchase the original from the CL brand itself, which is >>> $3000.
Personally, one can argue both ways. It's not like the shoes that you purchased aren't authentic, you're just personalizing it with a DIY project, which is fine. However, there are a lot of people who do have a different intent with trying to get the look for less $$$, and then they sell it or make a business out of it. It's definitely not wrong, nor illegal, but there are a lot of people who are opportunists which is not very kosher imo. So a lot of things have to do with one's intention of strassing.
2. Strassed shoes are a little passé for me... I think it's been exhausted over the last few years. They were only special like... 2009/2010 or something, then many other brands started to strass the shoes, including Manolo a few times.
3. Now speaking of Mr Blahnik... I personally think he's not so keen on following a Louboutin trend, especially a fading trend. Manolo is known for very classic shoes that are not so bling-bling-in-your-face. So it seems a bit of a clash to have strassed BBs which is relatively conservative in style.
4. I know some boutiques are very strict. Any tempering with their products (by yourself or a 3rd party) voids any warranties or after-sales care/repair/maintenance. I'd like to be stress-free, I always bring stuff back to boutiques for them to take care of issues, so I'm not going to mess with an original product.
At the end of the day, they're your shoes, do as you please!
Last edited:
the print, because it's subtle yet interesting. These are probably my most worn pair of BBs!!
