CLOSED - Authenticate This Marc Jacobs

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Definitely the ivory on yoogiscloset. And lighting makes a huge difference. The seller's cover photo looked to be the nude blush color but the other pics she posted made it look tan. I was hoping it was the cashew color when I ordered it but I love the bag anyway.

It's very pretty, congrats!

Cashew was a Fall 2006 color, if you're still looking for one.
 
Hey! Here are some more pictures. Do you know what this bag called & when it is from? Thanks so much for your help!

Authentic and it's the Classic Q Hillier. MBMJ doesn't have season tags so it's hard to tell the year. I want to say the logo lining was...2010-2014? If it has a white tag inside it's 2012? onward

I can barely remember the current month and date so I'm sure I'm off a bit.

[/QUOTE]
 
It's very pretty, congrats!

Cashew was a Fall 2006 color, if you're still looking for one.
I just bought another yesterday from therealreal (and hopefully it's authentic because it was a final sale) and they listed the color as beige/brown, so hoping that's it, or close. I'll crack up if I get the same exact color again. And thank you:)
 
I just bought another yesterday from therealreal (and hopefully it's authentic because it was a final sale) and they listed the color as beige/brown, so hoping that's it, or close. I'll crack up if I get the same exact color again. And thank you:)

I found it because I'm a stalker like that - it isn't Cashew because that's the wrong lining for Fall 2006, but it looks fine as far as authenticity goes. I think it's Nude or Blush, not sure of the season since TRR (annoyingly) never photographs the tag.

Hope this one is the color you're looking for!
 
I found it because I'm a stalker like that - it isn't Cashew because that's the wrong lining for Fall 2006, but it looks fine as far as authenticity goes. I think it's Nude or Blush, not sure of the season since TRR (annoyingly) never photographs the tag.

Hope this one is the color you're looking for!
You are hilarious! And apparently a Marc Jacobs genius. You've been so helpful! Nude or blush is great, as long as it's a different color than the ivory one I got from posh. Couldn't believe how cheap it was so I took a shot. Btw, I'm elde1978 on posh if you want to add me. I added you a few days ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted5682
Hi, I'm new to the Purse Forum! I received this MBMJ purse as a gift (was bought second-hand but in NWOT condition) and need help authenticating it.

Item name: Marc by Marc Jacobs Lil Ukita (color: cardamom brown)
Link: none
Seller: not sure; it was a gift, purchased second-hand NWOT
Who took the pictures: me
History: second-hand, but brand new without tags
Comments:
The first picture was taken in better lighting and reflects the true color of the bag. 20170407_110909.jpg 20170408_233449.jpg 20170408_233509.jpg 20170408_233528.jpg 20170408_233537.jpg 20170408_233544.jpg 20170408_233550.jpg 20170408_233558.jpg 20170408_235717.jpg It looks really good and the leather feels great, but I'm a little thrown by the style number on the inside, which is: M0001411A 81682. My other MBMJ purses don't have the "A" after the initial sequence. Also, the other pictures I've seen of the purse online feature the classic black and white Marc Jacobs logo lining and this one doesn't. I love it so I really hope it's authentic! Please help!

Thank you,
Jayne
 
Nothing looks off so far, but photos of the label and made in tag would confirm.

That sounds good. But I don't think it's the real pictures if the one he has. He is saying that it is a return bag from the store. Should I ask him to take picture of the labels and stuff ? I found it very very cheap if it's an original. There is no return if I buy it.
Thank you for your help ! This world is confusing :)
 
Hi, I'm new to the Purse Forum! I received this MBMJ purse as a gift (was bought second-hand but in NWOT condition) and need help authenticating it.

Item name: Marc by Marc Jacobs Lil Ukita (color: cardamom brown)
Link: none
Seller: not sure; it was a gift, purchased second-hand NWOT
Who took the pictures: me
History: second-hand, but brand new without tags
Comments:
The first picture was taken in better lighting and reflects the true color of the bag. View attachment 3661753 View attachment 3661754 View attachment 3661755 View attachment 3661757 View attachment 3661758 View attachment 3661759 View attachment 3661760 View attachment 3661761 View attachment 3661762 It looks really good and the leather feels great, but I'm a little thrown by the style number on the inside, which is: M0001411A 81682. My other MBMJ purses don't have the "A" after the initial sequence. Also, the other pictures I've seen of the purse online feature the classic black and white Marc Jacobs logo lining and this one doesn't. I love it so I really hope it's authentic! Please help!

Thank you,
Jayne

Authentic. MBMJ used several different linings and tags.
 
That sounds good. But I don't think it's the real pictures if the one he has. He is saying that it is a return bag from the store. Should I ask him to take picture of the labels and stuff ? I found it very very cheap if it's an original. There is no return if I buy it.
Thank you for your help ! This world is confusing :)

Yes, I would ask for photos of the label and tags. If you're saying the photos in the listing aren't of the bag being sold, photos of the actual bag are needed.
 
Hello
I'm new to this forum and really need all your help please. I have a Marc by Marc Jacobs bag that I am concerned might not be authentic.
Item: Marc by Marc Jacobs Billy Hobo Cross Body Bag
Listing Number: www.ebay.co.uk 252828184262
Seller: Jojo45898
Link: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/252828184262?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
Comments: I'm concerned as the label inside states "Made in China" and "100% lamb leather with cow leather trim" - it doesn't really smell like leather. The barcode has a code of M0002343 81683. Also not sire the zips are correct. In listing the seller states it was purchased in Florida last year, but now they are saying it was 4 years ago in Saks on Fifth Avenue.

What do you think? I can send more photos if needed.

Many thanks x
 
Hello
I'm new to this forum and really need all your help please. I have a Marc by Marc Jacobs bag that I am concerned might not be authentic.
Item: Marc by Marc Jacobs Billy Hobo Cross Body Bag
Listing Number: www.ebay.co.uk 252828184262
Seller: Jojo45898
Link: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/252828184262?_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT
Comments: I'm concerned as the label inside states "Made in China" and "100% lamb leather with cow leather trim" - it doesn't really smell like leather. The barcode has a code of M0002343 81683. Also not sire the zips are correct. In listing the seller states it was purchased in Florida last year, but now they are saying it was 4 years ago in Saks on Fifth Avenue.

What do you think? I can send more photos if needed.

Many thanks x

A photo of the made in tag would confirm, but it looks fine and that style code would be correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top