Clash: Ring or Necklace?

[lulu212121]

Necklace!

 

[PF2010]

Necklace! I own the small version and wear it everyday and think it is a very unique piece. While it has the same shape as the Tiffany necklace, that’s probably the only similarity in my opinion. The pendant has a fair amount of dimension and the chain has these pieces which reflect light and give it a bit of sparkle. I owned the ring but ended up returning it. In my profession, I have to wear gloves which are form fitting and just found the ring uncomfortable to wear. Good luck deciding!

 

[thundercloud]

I vote necklace too, since I find it simple enough for daily wear, but still edgy. It's on my wishlist.

 

[FlairBear]

I prefer the ring, which I own. I would get a bracelet next followed by the earrings. I feel like the necklace seems seems like you cut out a piece of a bracelet and decided to make it a necklace; I would prefer it to fit continuously around or at a minimum, half-way around the neck.

 

[darkangel07760]

Tough decision but the ring wins. I like both but the clash seems to be represented better in a circular form! Good luck with your decision!

 

[422stewart]

Personally I’d go for the ring. I feel dependent on your style and the necklines you wear the necklace would just get lost there.

 

[Lady Butterfly]

I would vote for the ring which I recently got while traveling. Super comfortable to wear. And I wear interchangeably between my index and middle fingers.

 

[Serpenti_Love]

Ring! I think the clash design looks best in either the bangle or ring. You can play with the little studs throughout the day, haha. I find it therapeutic.

 

[Swanky]

I feel like I’ve said this several times recently… ring over necklace so you can see/enjoy it
Both are on my list!

 

[Purrsey]

Ring! I think the clash design looks best in either the bangle or ring. You can play with the little studs throughout the day, haha. I find it therapeutic.

My daughter finds it therapeutic too when we are out together.

 

[Bag@holic12]

By the way @unhly_msqurade , in case you don't already know, in most places there's going to be a Cartier price increase of around 7–10% on 17th or 18th April: https://forum.purseblog.com/threads...-please-include-your-location.746152/page-279

 

[samiyahlk]

Ring over necklace always….I just bought my ring ahead of the price increase

 

[unhly_msqurade]

I think the ring looks better. It takes better advantage of the 3-dimensional movement in the rivets. If I were to imagine what was designed first, I would say the bracelet/ring in the clash collection were designed before the pendant was added. The repeating pattern better suits that type of continuous, seamless design.

Also, like was mentioned earlier, I think this arc pendant design reminds of the Tiffany smile pendant. Similarly, though in the inverse, the smile pendant seems like it was designed first, with the smile bracelet added later as an afterthought.

I completely understand what you’re saying and agree! One clearly preceded the other. Both look great, but that certainly does seem to be true.

 

[unhly_msqurade]

By the way @unhly_msqurade , in case you don't already know, in most places there's going to be a Cartier price increase of around 7–10% on 17th or 18th April: https://forum.purseblog.com/threads...-please-include-your-location.746152/page-279

Yes! I did my exchange/purchase today because i knew it was coming. The store was mobbed because everyone knew about the increase. Thanks so much for mentioning this!

 

[unhly_msqurade]

I am planning to get both but if I could only pick one, I'd pick the necklace. The style is unique. IMO it is harder to find a nice necklace than a ring.

However, you can't go wrong with either one!

I actually got both this afternoon! And I agree that nice rings are more common than a striking necklace.