Clash de Cartier

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I would try it closest to your wrist first because I think it is more comfortable there compared to the Love (as the Love has a sharper edge that can be uncomfortable when it goes over the wrist bone, but the clash is flexible and therefore a bit more comfortable for me to have in that position). I think it will scratch the JUC a lot if it is next to the tail portion of the JUC as well (if you put it at the elbow end of your stack).
That's indeed a good point. My fit is really snug though so my love doesn't cross over my wrist bone (except when I'm in the shower or cold nights).

when I bought my sm juc, I really planned to wear it closest to my wrist (as Swanky has mentioned here before, the fluidity should sit closest to wrist, which is my ideal too). But by wearing this way, the juc tail really scratched my love (little damage has been done). And I don't like to switch the orientation of the juc because if the tail end faces me, I get snag more often.

I guess I just need to get my ass to the store to know!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicole0612
That's indeed a good point. My fit is really snug though so my love doesn't cross over my wrist bone (except when I'm in the shower or cold nights).

when I bought my sm juc, I really planned to wear it closest to my wrist (as Swanky has mentioned here before, the fluidity should sit closest to wrist, which is my ideal too). But by wearing this way, the juc tail really scratched my love (little damage has been done). And I don't like to switch the orientation of the juc because if the tail end faces me, I get snag more often.

I guess I just need to get my ass to the store to know!

May I ask what do you mean about the fluidity?
 
Meaning the "softer look" bracelet. For this case, the sm juc, rather than the hard Love bracelet. Or perhaps any other kind of soft chain bracelet (that has fluid patterns and lines)
Hope what I explain makes sense lol.
Hm. That’s interesting. I had always thought about it in weight and that the heaviest or more/most substantial piece should be at the “bottom” closest to your wrist. Simply because of gravity, so that the heaviest isn’t clamoring down on the others when the arm is straightened when standing. I guess I should reassess.:hrmm:
 
Hm. That’s interesting. I had always thought about it in weight and that the heaviest or more/most substantial piece should be at the “bottom” closest to your wrist. Simply because of gravity, so that the heaviest isn’t clamoring down on the others when the arm is straightened when standing. I guess I should reassess.:hrmm:

There's no standard user manual and what you've thought about i can totally relate too!

I'm just thinking the "softer" one sits nearest to the wrist because that's the "fluid" part (aka movement) of our hand. Softness and fluidity go together.

but then, i think it also has to do with the fitting. My regular love, sm love pave and sm juc move very little when stacked together; and never overlap, and hardly cross over my wrist bone. I am probably one of those very few here who likes pretty snug fit. They dont seem to weigh down each other since they've never been a loose fit, if that makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwhit
Again, Cartier doesn't have my size for the thin. So I'm trying out again the small/thin in 15 and medium in 14. SA said the fit is the same so I will gauge likewise for both versions.

I think I'll shelf Clash for now because the smallest size at 14, it still crosses over my Love (not completely but enough to bother me). And if I wear it between my love and juc, the crossing over my juc is even worse.

why can't they make clash flush perfect with love?

5BD488AB-B46D-451E-8763-EB13F3408586.jpeg2544285F-3BC9-42BA-97BE-6E268CC2C609.jpeg208A25FB-935E-47D5-AFC9-B377746DB036.jpeg
 
Does anyone have a small Clash bracelet, Love bracelet, and diamond tennis bracelet worn with a regular JUC ring with diamonds? I know this is specific but thinking about building to that stack. Thanks.
 
Again, Cartier doesn't have my size for the thin. So I'm trying out again the small/thin in 15 and medium in 14. SA said the fit is the same so I will gauge likewise for both versions.

I think I'll shelf Clash for now because the smallest size at 14, it still crosses over my Love (not completely but enough to bother me). And if I wear it between my love and juc, the crossing over my juc is even worse.

why can't they make clash flush perfect with love?

View attachment 5274583View attachment 5274584View attachment 5274585

Just wanted to say I think you should go for it. Clash looks fantastic on you. I do have the clash as well and it will overlap my other bracelets here and there but never leaves any scratches. Any marks on my love are my own doing lol. I usually place the clash in the middle. I’m always more concerned with my JUC banging into my love.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purrsey
Just added the Clash de Cartier ring. Got it the same size (size 48) as my JUC slim ring but it is way heavier so I am thinking whether or not I should exchange it for one size down.

Does it feel loose? I would size down if you couldn’t wear it alone. You won’t always want to stack with JUC so definitely try it and see if it feels and fits better.
 
Again, Cartier doesn't have my size for the thin. So I'm trying out again the small/thin in 15 and medium in 14. SA said the fit is the same so I will gauge likewise for both versions.

I think I'll shelf Clash for now because the smallest size at 14, it still crosses over my Love (not completely but enough to bother me). And if I wear it between my love and juc, the crossing over my juc is even worse.

why can't they make clash flush perfect with love?

If you are looking for something to be totally flush with the Love, I don't think that the Clash is for you. For me personally, I do not consider the Clash to be a stacking piece unless you are doing a more of an eclectic, off-size stack if that makes sense. Here are a few random examples for you. Hope this helps with your decision.
IMG_2244 4.JPG

IMG_3310 3.JPG
IMG_3312 3.JPG
 
  • Love
Reactions: jenayb
Just wanted to say I think you should go for it. Clash looks fantastic on you. I do have the clash as well and it will overlap my other bracelets here and there but never leaves any scratches. Any marks on my love are my own doing lol. I usually place the clash in the middle. I’m always more concerned with my JUC banging into my love.
Thank you.
When I asked my jeweller to make this open bracelet for me, I told her it must stack perfect with my Love. And so it does; never crossing each other.
199E8D36-23A1-4238-92E2-DE76AFAF69AB.jpeg
I might consider Clash if I can find a breaker in between. But so far I haven't visually see anything I like that fits so.
 
If you are looking for something to be totally flush with the Love, I don't think that the Clash is for you. For me personally, I do not consider the Clash to be a stacking piece unless you are doing a more of an eclectic, off-size stack if that makes sense. Here are a few random examples for you. Hope this helps with your decision.
View attachment 5276668

View attachment 5276672
View attachment 5276674

I totally get you there especially with those pics of gorgeous stack (Which is not the kind of look I am gearing towards)

You rock in those!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jenayb
I totally get you there especially with those pics of gorgeous stack (Which is not the kind of look I am gearing towards)

You rock in those!!

Thank you. :hugs:

This is what I was hoping to illustrate - it's a specific look that not everyone is going for. :lol: On my left wrist, I have several Love that I wear 24/7 and I like the flush look which I believe is what you are after. On my right wrist, all bets are off and I do whatever. Anyway, like I said, I hope that this helps you with your decision bc the Clash is not an inexpensive piece! Happy Holidays. :flowers:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purrsey
Top