his silence makes it obvious. he is never silent.
if this were untrue, he'd make it well known.
if this were untrue, he'd make it well known.
Charlie Sheen
- Thread starter BagLovingMom
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
ITA. IMHO no one is at fault for having an STD, (I mean it's there for a reason, you had unprotected sex but I would not feel bad about having one. It can happen with one try and in this day & age, most people have had unprotected sex at least one time.) but if you have unprotected sex with a woman after you know that you have that and you fail to tell her that you know you have an STD, (and I know it's a very hard situation to probably tell people but STILL), then that speaks volumes about your character.
Super calculated, seeing as how the Enquirer is scheduled to run their story on him tomorrow as well.
TMZ ‏@TMZ 5m5 minutes ago #BREAKING Charlie Sheen Will Disclose HIV Status on 'Today' http://tmz.me/xJff5Of
View summary 0 retweets 0 likes
View summary 0 retweets 0 likes
If it is indeed him whoever wrote that blind Item should go back to blind item writing school...
Ditto. Not everyone he has had sex with will have access/be able to afford the cocktail of wonder drugs that he is likely on to keep it from becoming full blown AIDS.
I was just re-watching Red Dawn this past weekend. Man I love that movie. And now Jed has passed on and Matt has HIV. Sigh.
This for sure. No way I would ever consider him an acting genius or worldwide megastar or whatever else the blind said. Also, it really made it sound like someone who would be a surprise... and Sheen really isn't, especially combining his lifestyle with the Sony leak. Sheesh.
The ONLY thing I can guess is perhaps the clues were intentionally elusive, so as not to give it away.
I agree with this. Rumors are that he didn't even tell his former fiance & continued having unprotected sex with her.
This for sure. No way I would ever consider him an acting genius or worldwide megastar or whatever else the blind said. Also, it really made it sound like someone who would be a surprise... and Sheen really isn't, especially combining his lifestyle with the Sony leak. Sheesh.
The ONLY thing I can guess is perhaps the clues were intentionally elusive, so as not to give it away.
I agree with this. Rumors are that he didn't even tell his former fiance & continued having unprotected sex with her.
I guess I'm in the minority in thinking that it's the responsibility of the women (or men) who chose to sleep with Charlie Sheen to protect themselves. It's 2015, everyone knows what the ramifications of casual, unprotected sex are and Charlie Sheen is not some random nobody. They all knew exactly who he was and the type of lifestyle he leads when choosing to have sex with him.
Is it ethically wrong for him not to disclose? Absolutely. Legally? I don't think it should be, at least in the case of consensual sex.
Is it ethically wrong for him not to disclose? Absolutely. Legally? I don't think it should be, at least in the case of consensual sex.
I'd never consider being HIV+ as a shameful thing but yeah as others have said knowingly having unprotected sex when you know your status in no bueno.
Yeah probably. That's blind gossip; twist, distort, exaggerate, embellish, make the truth just out of reach for maximum titillation.
But also if you read the original blind on Radar the "acting genius" part was a quote from the person who leaked the story. It was a subjective evaluation not an objective fact. The girlfriend clues and the general description of the actor were the more concrete clues given by Radar.
Blinds often say... "the revelation will shock you", "never will you guess", "not in a million years"... it's just their way of reeling in readers. And in a sense there is always someone who will be shocked by the news, the majority of the world is not initiated with the world of blind gossip (that G*d), so in a sense they are right.
Yeah probably. That's blind gossip; twist, distort, exaggerate, embellish, make the truth just out of reach for maximum titillation.
But also if you read the original blind on Radar the "acting genius" part was a quote from the person who leaked the story. It was a subjective evaluation not an objective fact. The girlfriend clues and the general description of the actor were the more concrete clues given by Radar.
Blinds often say... "the revelation will shock you", "never will you guess", "not in a million years"... it's just their way of reeling in readers. And in a sense there is always someone who will be shocked by the news, the majority of the world is not initiated with the world of blind gossip (that G*d), so in a sense they are right.
^ I agree it is the responsibility of both parties in this day & age, and I'm kind of shocked that people are still going around having unprotected sex. So I do agree with those points.
But if you KNOW you have a life-threatening illness that is sexually transmitted, and you intentionally conceal that information, then you are infecting those people intentionally. IMHO it's no different than feeding someone poison or injecting them with cancer cells. You are cutting that person's life short (potentially).
But if you KNOW you have a life-threatening illness that is sexually transmitted, and you intentionally conceal that information, then you are infecting those people intentionally. IMHO it's no different than feeding someone poison or injecting them with cancer cells. You are cutting that person's life short (potentially).
