Aged gold will result in a “windshield wipe” effect on the hardware while ruthenium doesn’t show the same wear. If one wears the bag a lot that type of wear is inevitable and pretty quick, actually. I personally will not invest in Chanel aged gold hardware anymore in a Reissue style as it’s subpar quality. The reissue lock will show a “rainbow’’ in AGHW quickly. I agree that gold makes reissue classic looking. It’s a more mature classic look while ruthenium makes the bag less matronly and more modern. As for the pointy top of the contemporary reissues, I find that it’s nearly impossible to find a perfect more rounded top brand new. There were plenty produced with a more rounded beautiful top which would eventually sharpen over the years. Nowadays they mostly come out sharp right out of boutiques. Chanel taking more production shortcuts? I personally looked at at least 6-7 226 reissues in black before I found the one with a more rounded top. There were plenty of other issues with those bags (not picky but was surprised at the amount of popped stitches, strange horizontal lines on the brand new MII across the front flaps and other quality issues). Mine happened to be MIF. Softer tops 225s and 226s do exist though. Brand new reissue minis are pretty much always sharper at the top in my experience. If not then mini will sharpen at the top within the first couple of weeks of wear. “Sharp” or “rounded” - reissues are quintessential Chanel! My reissues and Loewe are the most worn everyday pieces.
what do you mean by ‘windshield wipe’? Is it like the attached photo?
Which Loewe do you prefer by the way ? I’ve been thinking about the puzzle and the hammock


Last edited: