Celebrity Wedding Rings

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#8,161
Swanky said:
I think very large stones look best in more shapes less faceted, like an emerald or asscher.
We have a good family friend who is very wealthy. Her original e-ring is now worn on her left hand and appears to easily be a 12 carat asscher stone, she moved it to left hand when her hubby gave her a giant emerald on their 30th anniversary, it also looks to be easily 12-15 carats. She wears them well, they're very understated settings and she's considerably taller than me. But they wouldn't look as good in RBs in my personal opinion.
My RB is just over 4 carats and I cannot imagine being able to wear anything larger on the daily, I do have a small ring size, but still! lol
Click to expand...

its an interesting observation! I tend to agree that there’s an upper size limit for RB in my opinion, after which I just wouldn’t want RB (7-8cts maybe) - I mean I wouldn’t turn it down ;) but that would be my preference. But I’ve seen some beautiful pears and ovals in the 10-12ct range online (and very very occasionally in person!) and I think they look absolutely stunning. I think for me I just think that elongated shapes look better in bigger sizes as opposed to more contained shapes (I don’t like very big princess or asscher cuts either).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glitterbomb
#8,171
uhpharm01 said:
hell how much does that ring cost? holy cow!!
Click to expand...
Wait till you see the Ashoka cut diamond she's wearing here. 41.37 carat D Flawless, it's the Ashoka diamond from which the name and the cut originates from (crafted in India by an unknown artist).
maria-felix-697x1024.jpg
As a comparison, here's how the Ashoka cut compares to an Emerald cut.
Picture7.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Reactions: LaBoheme, Glitterbomb, CATEYES and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top