TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
2nd! looks like plain glass. strange ...That is not a pretty radiant at all! At least not in my view. But I am impressed they sold such a large stone.
*cough* Cut is one of the 4 c's![]()
i also think the picture is at an odd angle. it actually seems like a nice stone but photos of stones--particularly fancy cuts-- are always hard. Radiants are not my preference. they are bastardizations of other cuts. faceting hides many ills. they are a less expensive way to save rough (inflate carat weight) mask color and clarity issues. princess cuts are worse in my opinion.....That is not a pretty radiant at all! At least not in my view. But I am impressed they sold such a large stone.
My issue with it is definitely in the cut. I just don't understand why it wasn't cut better. If you have a rough diamond that you can get a 7 carat out of, wih decent specs, why would you cut it like that? I don't get it. Unless this is how a radiant should look and i've been misguided. Lol.
While it isn't something I'd choose for myself, I sure wouldn't turn it down! Of course, from the right man, I wouldn't turn down a gumball ring, either.
^^I hope that doesn't embarrass Catabie![]()
I agree with this 100%! I sooo don't understand why all stones aren't perfectly cut (or close to it). How much carat loss can 3-5 degree angle differences really make? And Symmetry and Polish?! Why not cut them with perfect symmetry and polish superbly?? It costs you nothing (except maybe higher tech equipment, which would be worth the investment anyway). Cut is the one thing that diamond people can control and yet they allow their goods to be devalued by doing a half-cooked job. I just don't get it.