TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I feel we walk a fine line as we age. I don't want to dress like an old lady but I also think (hope) I know my limits. Not trying to look like I'm in my twenties or to show a lot of cleavage, etc.Personally, I’d look for more compassion with things. I’m getting older. It's a struggle. I've exercised consistently my entire life, but my body composition has changed/is changing/will continue to change. I have so many "classic" pieces that I bought and took care of thinking I'd wear them forever and while they still fit, I'm so self-conscious wearing them because they fit differently. I still love those pieces, but I also feel like I'm just trying to hold onto my youth. I don't think that feeling is going to get better with time.
So I'm at a style crossroads. I'm mainly sticking with dresses from American Giant right now, which might or might not be better than the uniform, but it's the same thing for me. They're comfortable and I blend in, which is all I can really ask for these days from my fashion, because otherwise, I love being my age and the things that come along with it.
I just came from a meeting with my peers, all but two of whom are over 60, and all but one of whom dressed like the image shared by @foxgal. It’s the uniform for the fashion-disinterested middle to upper middle class American woman who doesn’t live in a major urban environment. Appropriate without being fussy, and reasonably comfortable.
I don’t know where I got the quote, but someone wrote “Trends are uniforms for the young.” And while I think that may be a little harsh, how we dress reflects where we fit or aspire to fit in our community
Over the last two weeks, I’ve read Sajid’s article about “Trend Cycles getting Shorter” and the accompanying hyperlinks. And “Empresses of Seventh Avenue” by Nancy MacDonell (brilliant book, btw, focused on the development of New York fashion) And the GemFlix lecture “How to Wear It: Vintage Jewelry Style” by Christine Cheng. And someone recently recommended David Kibbe’s 2025 book, (the Power of Style) so I’m about a chapter into that.
In Cheng’s lecture, she used Mikey Madison as one example - on the press tours for “Anora”, she deliberately dressed in a very elegant vintage-inspired wardrobe to contrast with her character. She was demonstrating that she was nothing like her brash, contemporary heroine, and so her performance was due to excellent acting.
And of course, Sajid’s discussion of “starter packs”, Heidi Boys and Performative Males reminded me of the Punks and Grunge of my own misspent youth. When Vulture did an article ten years ago about “where have all the Hipsters gone,” the quote I still remember was “You either died a punk, or you lived long enough to be rockabilly.” Community members levels of responsibility and interdependence changes over time. Likewise, small groups identities are commercialized for the trend cycle, which means that as they are consumable, anti-consumption group’s members distance themselves from their former aesthetic.
“Empresses” took a chapter to talk about about Louis XIV and Empress Eugenie, and how prior to the Fall of Paris, Americans copied French styles - directly, in many cases, as Chanel, and Delong, and Scarpielli would license gowns to be copied by American garment factories - and the huge number of gowns that weren’t licensed but were copied. Two of the things that stuck with me from that book that I think are relevant. 1) French fashion as an industry was created by Jean-Baptiste Colbert (XIV’s minister of finance) to increase taxation and to both engage women in commerce (women weren’t allowed in the older guild system, but could make “casual” mantuas under the new system - and paid taxes on what they made,) 2) families would lose influence in the court of Napoleon III if a woman’s gown was considered out of mode, which leads me to the conclusion that 3) the origins of trends are fear of not belonging.
Forgive me for rambling, but I have a Lot of Thoughts.
The “Jersey knit and cropped pants” women have found clothes that align with the values of their group, and are no less stylish than the head-to-toe trendy young adult.
Trends are in some ways, anti-style, because they are submerging the individual identity into the group identity
Have we actually seen anyone dressed like this irl?Egad...blogs for "mature" women are actually PROMOTING this look! And a couple of the ladies are doing a french tuck to try to be current but that's now out.
View attachment 6217046
💯No. Flattering means it brings out the best about your shape and character. I may not like a particular piece you are wearing, studs and patterns may not be to my taste, or the colours maybe a mess in my opinion, but have to admit that the cut fits you well and flatters your body shape and the bold colours show off your personality. It's not about personal taste it's about the architecture of the human body and the garments that adorn it. For example, low waisted jeans do not flatter short legs just as high waisted jeans do not flatter a heavy midriff. That of course is not to say they can't wear them, it's simply to say that they would look far better in a different cut.
I see at least 10 every time I go anywhere.Have we actually seen anyone dressed like this irl?
I know what colors I can wear and pretty much stick to them. Once in a while I'll try something I know isn't my color. Never works out.I stopped looking at trends seriously. The last time I tried a trend was that burgundy or dark red/brown colors and they didn't feel like me. It felt like it was limited to fall/winter and I felt like it aged me. Never looked back or tried another trend since.