Balenciaga City - would you buy the "old" model now?

Hi everyone,
I've never had a city bag before and I've recently started looking for light colored bag. I found a small City "old/ original" model in grayish white on sale for $1600 (new), attaching pics. I think I like this bag more than the new neo city. However since I've never owned city, I'm not sure what's the sentiment out there, does it look dated? Is everyone already tired of it?
I think I like it, but I'd rather not keep a bag that's gonna look completely outdated in 2+ years.
Please let me know how do you feel about wearing the old City for years to come :smile:

Thanks!!
I'm sure you gonna like one of top 60 reputable real money casinos https://openandroidalliance.com and start to gamble now.

View attachment 5064878
For sure. It's a lovey bag and it shouldn't be a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maria333
Loved reading all these comments as I'm on the hunt for my first Balenciaga. Was honestly thinking the Mini City Classic and found an all black style available in store on sale also. But then after doing a lot of research, I just can't get past the Neo Classic and the structure of the bag. I guess to me it's aesthetically more pleasing as I prefer a more structured bag. They are both beautiful bags.
 
Well, for me .. as a long-time collector of Balenciaga (from the first "moto" bag - 2003 1 - F/W), well .. I'm 'jaded' in that I have always LOVED the "original" City bag (with the original hardware - either Pewter or the Brass). I must say though, that I do like the style of both the Hourglass and the Neo Classic, but to me .. they are the ones that are trendy and will look outdated soon (likely, next year). As @ksuromax said (very well), the "original" City has been around for some time and was touted as a "classic" by Vogue Magazine some years back. While you may not see as many folks carrying them as before (which I kind of like!) .. it's a bag that still perks up the eyes (and you better believe that if I see a lady carrying one - I start up a conversation)!!

All that being said, bottom line?!?! .. YOU have to be happy with your choice ..
 
I love checking out new handbag trends (guilty of chasing the shiny new object syndrome), but honestly, I've ended up with a closet of bags I hardly use. I'm starting to learn that I need to just stick to what I'm actually going to use and not be swayed by a cute design or color. Functionality is what really does it for me.

The classic City bag and my Town bag are 2 bags that have consistently been pulled out of my closet at least one season during the year. I can't say the same for many of my other more expensive bags. They're so easy to use, soft, spacious, durable, and age well. They're casual and edgy but can be dressed up if you want. I just think the bag suits my style so well and I'm thinking about getting another in a fun color! I say go for it.
 
I like the size and vibe of the old City, hands down.

I’ve been off Balenciaga for years and the first time I visited the Bal boutique here last year, I asked where the City bags where and the SA brought out this small bag from the backroom and called it a “City”. :confused1: That’s when I realised there a difference between old B gals and new B gals... and I’m just part of the old crew.

I didn’t really think even back then that when you carried a Balenciaga that you were “trendy”. It was more about your personal style and what suits your look and of course, if the bag works for what you need it for. But it was part of the IT bags era... and the City outlived the Spy, the Saddle and the Paddington. So to me it’s a bit of a Classic, more than a fad.
 
I like the size and vibe of the old City, hands down.

I’ve been off Balenciaga for years and the first time I visited the Bal boutique here last year, I asked where the City bags where and the SA brought out this small bag from the backroom and called it a “City”. :confused1: That’s when I realised there a difference between old B gals and new B gals... and I’m just part of the old crew.

I didn’t really think even back then that when you carried a Balenciaga that you were “trendy”. It was more about your personal style and what suits your look and of course, if the bag works for what you need it for. But it was part of the IT bags era... and the City outlived the Spy, the Saddle and the Paddington. So to me it’s a bit of a Classic, more than a fad.
Agree with this. I love my "old" mini city!
 
I love how this thread is still going! Although I returned the bag and do not regret it, I do think it's a great bag. It just wasn't my style and didn't suit me in terms of practicality, too large for everyday, too small for laptop... I'm also glad I returned it because of my recent super annoying shopping experience at balenciaga.com which I posted about in a different thread, so I'm done with the brand for now.
However I have to admit that the city bag does look very cool and stylish!
 
I love how this thread is still going! Although I returned the bag and do not regret it, I do think it's a great bag. It just wasn't my style and didn't suit me in terms of practicality, too large for everyday, too small for laptop... I'm also glad I returned it because of my recent super annoying shopping experience at balenciaga.com which I posted about in a different thread, so I'm done with the brand for now.
However I have to admit that the city bag does look very cool and stylish!

Oh wow. I didn’t even check the date when I replied to this. Haha :facepalm:

But I’m glad you were able to figure out that it DIDN’T work for you (and that you didn’t enjoy the experience of buying it off b.com). I think it comes with the territory of buying bags... you learn as you go. This is why tPF is such a good resource... plus you get input from other seasoned bag gals.

What bag did you end up getting then? Or are you still on the hunt?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Maria333