--- Authenticate This Gucci ---

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

Status
Not open for further replies.
sorry i suppose to post it here:

Ok I'm not v experienced with buying Gucci online but im pretty sure this is authentic. The seller confirmed that the bag shown in the pics are what you get exactly.

eBay: Auth GUCCI $1570 Monogram Wave Boston Speedy Bag Purse (item 200054508037 end time Dec-12-06 18:00:00 PST)

I don't believe it is new she may have used it one or 2 time and is in new condition. Howvere I dont mind as long as I get the real deal at a good price.

Personally the monograms and hardware corresponds to Gucci.com website so I'm pretty sure it is authentic however i need to b very sure as some u guy are far more experienced. All monogram symmetry is perfect with every edge to the oterh side and even monograms match perfectly even where the hardwares are exactly to the website. Showing very excellent craftsmanship

I ask her how did she obtain the bag so cheap. She explained that it was damaged stock at Saks fifth avenue where the pin came loose from handle. However after she bought it she took to the Gucci boutique for repair which was very easily fixed.

I do know that damaged stock in th US especially at Saks gets discounted up 2 75% or more depending how bad it is.

Do u know this edition has this lining with the bostons?

Thank so much for your help!
 
this is my first time posting one of these so i will do my best to provide all the info I can...I bought this bag on ebay from eluxshoppe-they had 100% positive feedback and I paid just under $300.00...can you tell me if it's real or fake?


here's the link:
eBay: GUCCI 85th Limited Edition Leather Handbag AUTHENTIC (item 330057240324 end time Dec-05-06 10:29:45 PST)

item # 330057240324

serial # on inside tag:163290 first line
001998 sencond line

there was gucci plastic on all the metal

controllo card has: 1234567890 on it

feels like nice leather

thanks Esther
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top