Originally Posted by Hyacinth
The real problem with he inside pocket is the way the leather is wrinkled. There probably are other things wrong with it too, but the leather on the inside pocket shouldn't have "stretch marks" like this one does.
No, the leather on the outside of the pocket has a lot of sort-of-parallel wrinkles that always remind me of stretch-marked skin, and it's not a natural effect. I think it happens when leather is overly stretched while trying to soften it, because I've seen those marks on a lot of fakes and always in places where they shouldn't be. It's normal to get some marks in areas of a bag where the leather gets pulled and stretched during use, like the bottom corners. But how much pulling and stretching is the inside pocket exposed to?
Here's an example - this isn't what the creed stamp means when it mentions "scars, scratches, veins and wrinkles" - these are "stretch marks" and indicate damage to the leather itself, NOT any kind of natural markings:

By stretch marks do you mean at the bottom of the pocket? It looks like maybe a lipgloss (long) or something like that was stored in there? Although on the right side the leather has a more pebbled look. Not at all trying to be difficult I assure you,just trying to learn![]()
No, the leather on the outside of the pocket has a lot of sort-of-parallel wrinkles that always remind me of stretch-marked skin, and it's not a natural effect. I think it happens when leather is overly stretched while trying to soften it, because I've seen those marks on a lot of fakes and always in places where they shouldn't be. It's normal to get some marks in areas of a bag where the leather gets pulled and stretched during use, like the bottom corners. But how much pulling and stretching is the inside pocket exposed to?
Here's an example - this isn't what the creed stamp means when it mentions "scars, scratches, veins and wrinkles" - these are "stretch marks" and indicate damage to the leather itself, NOT any kind of natural markings: