TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
I love both cuts but an Asscher (Royal) has more facets...more sparkle then an Emerald. If you end up with an Emerald get the best clarity you can find/afford.
I agree.my e-ring is an emerald and it sparkles like crazy!! clarity is VVS2, if you are not planning on getting the best clarity you can afford or less than a 1 ct i think you are better off getting an asscher. IMO emeralds are prettier larger, in order to appreciate the beautiful step-cut.
If you love the elongated shape of the emerald cut but want more faceting, check out the Crisscut Emerald. It's a patented cut by Christopher Designs. A standard emerald cut stone has 46 facets. The Crisscut emerald has 77 facets.
My ering is a Crisscut emerald. It's pretty amazing. (very similar to the cut of Reese Witherspoon's Ashoka diamond.
Here is the link to the site.
http://www.christopherdesigns.com/Crisscut/emerald
and the video
http://www.christopherdesigns.com/Crisscut/emerald[/QUOTE]
Wonderful idea...I forgot about the Crisscut emerald cut.
Post a pic of your gorgeous ring!
A Royal Asscher is the way to go...fabulous!It's hard to see asschers in person, so I thought I would post some pics of mine. I also was due for an upgrade on my original stone. I considered asschers and emeralds as well because I love the step cut look. But ultimately I'm a sucker for symmetry and I went with the asscher. However, as most will tell you, not all asschers are created equal and to minimize the risk of getting a dud asscher, I got a Royal Asscher-branded asscher, which is a brand cut.
One picture is the ring when I first got it, then in the sun and then a closeup I tried to take (it had gotten pretty dirty by that point).
Diamond specs:
- 2.61 ct
- Royal Asscher
- 7.63 mm x 7.61 mm x 5.27 mm
- Color: I
- Clarity: VS1
- Polish: Excellent
- Symmetry; Very Good
- Depth: 69.3%
- Table: 53%
- Flourescence: None
Ring specs:
- Size 5
- 2 mm wide band
It's hard to see asschers in person, so I thought I would post some pics of mine. I also was due for an upgrade on my original stone. I considered asschers and emeralds as well because I love the step cut look. But ultimately I'm a sucker for symmetry and I went with the asscher. However, as most will tell you, not all asschers are created equal and to minimize the risk of getting a dud asscher, I got a Royal Asscher-branded asscher, which is a brand cut.
One picture is the ring when I first got it, then in the sun and then a closeup I tried to take (it had gotten pretty dirty by that point).
Diamond specs:
- 2.61 ct
- Royal Asscher
- 7.63 mm x 7.61 mm x 5.27 mm
- Color: I
- Clarity: VS1
- Polish: Excellent
- Symmetry; Very Good
- Depth: 69.3%
- Table: 53%
- Flourescence: None
Ring specs:
- Size 5
- 2 mm wide band
Barashinda, I am having heart palpitations looking at your ring. Spectacular stone!!!It's hard to see asschers in person, so I thought I would post some pics of mine. I also was due for an upgrade on my original stone. I considered asschers and emeralds as well because I love the step cut look. But ultimately I'm a sucker for symmetry and I went with the asscher. However, as most will tell you, not all asschers are created equal and to minimize the risk of getting a dud asscher, I got a Royal Asscher-branded asscher, which is a brand cut.
One picture is the ring when I first got it, then in the sun and then a closeup I tried to take (it had gotten pretty dirty by that point).
Diamond specs:
- 2.61 ct
- Royal Asscher
- 7.63 mm x 7.61 mm x 5.27 mm
- Color: I
- Clarity: VS1
- Polish: Excellent
- Symmetry; Very Good
- Depth: 69.3%
- Table: 53%
- Flourescence: None
Ring specs:
- Size 5
- 2 mm wide band