TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Ladies,
most of the bags are made in third countries. Even if there is written "made in USA or " made in France", it is not totally made in USA or France.
Please be realistic. We are not paying for craftmanship, we are paying for the brand name.
LV, Gucci & Co are not charity companies.
No one has anything against Chinese or Indian workers. Everybody knows that Serge Lesage ( for Dior) had his embroidery made in India because that's where he found the best workers in that field. CD's rich customers knew it too and it was not a problem at all, on the contrary they were aware they were buying the best...
If tomorrow I visit China and hear of a Chinese bag designer there, I will be proud to bring one of his bags back to France.
But.....I don't want to overpay for a French brand which is going to China to cut costs and continues to rise their prices....
Ask a Chinese lady if she is ready to buy a Made in China Longchamp.....
Really? If the bag was made in Spain or Portugal, or Germany would you have any issues against it?
When I lived in the USA, I had a Mercedes Benz that was made in the USA. It wasn't any less of Mercedes for me because it was American. And didn't cost any less btw.
My Made in China Mulberry does not equal poor quality just in my mind, it equals poor quality in a side by side comparison, as many photos of other's bags throughout the subforums on here can similarly attest to.
Expensive luxury handbags are being made in China due to the immense competitive advantage that Asian markets provide in manufacturing, thus translating to higher profit margins for the companies that own the handbag lines (actually cross subsidising loss-leading sectors of their businesses). That they are doing so whilst simultaneously exploiting their French/Italian/English-ness is what really p'ssd me off because I bought it not checking first, and would not have done so had I checked.
This is what consumers are getting sick of; feeling like they're being mislead.
I haven't seen a post where anyone has actually said a handbag can't be made in Asia EXACTLY the same way as it is in Europe or the US (even though the proof of the pudding does show significant compromises); the point is they were made in Asia because minimum working conditions and pay is relatively (and significantly) lower and it's unclear on the label. They were made in Asia to cut corners for dollars, when they are still charging increasingly inflated prices for said products which purportedly reflect European 'provenance'/manufacturing. It is not a criticism of a race, it is questioning the manipulation of the market by many big brands in the fashion business who trade on the goodwill of heritage brands but sell products which are sometimes bereft of this integrity.
To make a purchasing decision with this understanding is not racism, it is economics; Veblen's upward sloping demand curve comes to mind. Generalising people's choices as racist, because they choose not to support the purchase of handbags made by big brands in cheaper cost-base countries, especially those that are camoflaged in dubious labels, is IMHO, not right either.
Expensive luxury handbags are being made in China due to the immense competitive advantage that Asian markets provide in manufacturing, thus translating to higher profit margins for the companies that own the handbag lines (actually cross subsidising loss-leading sectors of their businesses).
Ladies,
most of the bags are made in third countries. Even if there is written "made in USA or " made in France", it is not totally made in USA or France.
Please be realistic. We are not paying for craftmanship, we are paying for the brand name.
LV, Gucci & Co are not charity companies.
My Made in China Mulberry does not equal poor quality just in my mind, it equals poor quality in a side by side comparison, as many photos of other's bags throughout the subforums on here can similarly attest to.
Expensive luxury handbags are being made in China due to the immense competitive advantage that Asian markets provide in manufacturing, thus translating to higher profit margins for the companies that own the handbag lines (actually cross subsidising loss-leading sectors of their businesses). That they are doing so whilst simultaneously exploiting their French/Italian/English-ness is what really p'ssd me off because I bought it not checking first, and would not have done so had I checked.
This is what consumers are getting sick of; feeling like they're being mislead.
I haven't seen a post where anyone has actually said a handbag can't be made in Asia EXACTLY the same way as it is in Europe or the US (even though the proof of the pudding does show significant compromises); the point is they were made in Asia because minimum working conditions and pay is relatively (and significantly) lower and it's unclear on the label. They were made in Asia to cut corners for dollars, when they are still charging increasingly inflated prices for said products which purportedly reflect European 'provenance'/manufacturing. It is not a criticism of a race, it is questioning the manipulation of the market by many big brands in the fashion business who trade on the goodwill of heritage brands but sell products which are sometimes bereft of this integrity.
To make a purchasing decision with this understanding is not racism, it is economics; Veblen's upward sloping demand curve comes to mind. Generalising people's choices as racist, because they choose not to support the purchase of handbags made by big brands in cheaper cost-base countries, especially those that are camoflaged in dubious labels, is IMHO, not right either.
Italy, Portugal and Spain have nearly the same costs as France.
In China, a worker earns approximately 200 euros....
And that makes a serious difference. Well at least...it should.
If you look at Marc Jacobs for instance, his premier line is made in Italy , the bags are three times as expensive as the Marc by Marc Jacobs line
which is made in Asia.
Marc Jacobs is a very honest person.
My Made in China Mulberry does not equal poor quality just in my mind, it equals poor quality in a side by side comparison, as many photos of other's bags throughout the subforums on here can similarly attest to.
Expensive luxury handbags are being made in China due to the immense competitive advantage that Asian markets provide in manufacturing, thus translating to higher profit margins for the companies that own the handbag lines (actually cross subsidising loss-leading sectors of their businesses). That they are doing so whilst simultaneously exploiting their French/Italian/English-ness is what really p'ssd me off because I bought it not checking first, and would not have done so had I checked.
This is what consumers are getting sick of; feeling like they're being mislead.
I haven't seen a post where anyone has actually said a handbag can't be made in Asia EXACTLY the same way as it is in Europe or the US (even though the proof of the pudding does show significant compromises); the point is they were made in Asia because minimum working conditions and pay is relatively (and significantly) lower and it's unclear on the label. They were made in Asia to cut corners for dollars, when they are still charging increasingly inflated prices for said products which purportedly reflect European 'provenance'/manufacturing. It is not a criticism of a race, it is questioning the manipulation of the market by many big brands in the fashion business who trade on the goodwill of heritage brands but sell products which are sometimes bereft of this integrity.
To make a purchasing decision with this understanding is not racism, it is economics; Veblen's upward sloping demand curve comes to mind. Generalising people's choices as racist, because they choose not to support the purchase of handbags made by big brands in cheaper cost-base countries, especially those that are camoflaged in dubious labels, is IMHO, not right either.