TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
This.
I am fully aware that all of the high end luxury brands have price increases every year. I think what bothers me so much with this year's increase is how much of a discrepancy in prices there is between different parts of the world. A difference in price due to a state or country's tax is one thing; this is different. I'm not angry about it. But I am disappointed and a little saddened.
What thoughtful and intelligent arguments all around! I do believe that this point however is most simply stated; if offered, we WILL buy. I'm not going to pass on a B or K because of an increase or the reality that it's thousands less in Europe.I'm surprised how many people say they'll go to Europe to purchase a B/K/etc. because of the price discrepancy. Does everyone have a SA there? Lol. We all know it's hard to get a coveted bag without being a local or regular...how many people are willing to pay thousands to go to Europe and run the risk of not being offered anything? With H, it's always been a take it or leave it type of mentality. After the price increase, I bet people will still take whatever they're offered in fears of not being offered anything else in the near future.
I don't worry much about the price increase- I'll still buy if I'm offered something I love. I do hope my Paris SA pulls through for me and gets me something nice this summer, and I almost secretly hope my US SA's don't get those K's I've been waiting on, but I'll play it all by ear. I do know I don't really want a Toolbox anymore if it's going to cost nearly as much as a K or B though! And I sure hope housewares don't increase too much since I still need to buy more dishes!
This is closer to what was suggested by my SA at one of the stores. . . 10% was the bottom number.
I hesitate to add anything to the discussion about the increasethe truth is, most of the time, I prefer vintage anyway . . . older box, chamonix, and barenia are powerful seducers. While I hoped to acquire a couple of pretty bags from boutiques this year, it's okay if the price increases and USA/EU disparity discourage me.
I'll remain a customer, I'm sure, but I'm working with a couple of SAs to acquire some pieces I want before the awful moment arrives.
I never considered the correlation between the real estate bubble and out of control retail price increases but it makes complete sense. Thanks for this post. I think you also hit the proverbial nail on the head, my dear Monceau!
Prices in Asia has always been significantly higher than Europe and North America, minimally 30% more. In some countries, it is even greater than 40%, more so now as the Euro has depreciated. About 5-6 years ago, prices at my local stores also moved in annual increases of 8-15% for a few years and I'm curious to see what/where the sales numbers are today.
I would question that Hermes is looking to or has ever looked to the middle class as a key customer segment for them. If you queried people, I would guess that very few would think $10,000 for a handbag is rational, much less a must have. Or $500 +/- for a scarf. I agree the amount of the increase feels like a slap in the face to many of their existing customers, no matter their financial means (no one enjoys paying a lot more for something, regardless of their personal finances) but I am betting that by the end of this year, their sales will be as robust, if not more so, than in previous years. Chanel and LV are not far behind them in terms of pricing or price increases. I doubt those brands will suffer much either.
Good point, but you have to remember .... that Hermes has to pay customs and tariffs on the bags that they import, around 8% !!!!! I do not think they would intentionally shift inventory-I must admit I keep coming back to this thread because I'm enjoying the discussion. Here's my two cents.
From the corporation's perspective, I think they feel the need to "make-up" lost revenue from the decrease in the value of the Euro. So if the euro keeps dropping, the revenue needs to be made up somewhere. That's where the US comes in. Our price increase and the strength of the dollar helps fill the revenue gap. I've been part of many large companies that don't feel like currency fluctuations are any excuse to not show growth in their bottom line. Now, to further play this out, H may even shift inventory for their desired bags (like B's and K's) out of the Euro zone to the US for purchase, because why wouldn't they want to get a higher price for the same product? So we may find that scoring a B or K in Paris will become a lot harder and much easier in the US this year. But, this may all backfire on Hermes and the US customer may slow down purchases but guess what? prices are easy to change. Just get your employees to spend a day re-ticketing and reprograming the computers and voila, you can go back to your old price that's more acceptable to your customers. But I highly doubt this is going to happen!
Now, from my perspective, the reason I find the price hike in the US ridiculous is because our friends in the Euro Zone are paying thousands less for the exact same product! It's kind of like airplane seats. I get a bit miffed if I know the person in the seat next to me paid much less for the same seat. It's a matter of principle. I just don't like to get snookered. And it doesn't matter if you're upper class, middle class, or somewhere in between, almost everyone likes to get a good deal.
So personally, for me, I'm with Vigee. I will delay any large purchases for the trips I take to Europe. Smaller purchases like scarves or bracelets, will probably continue to be made in the US because the price difference is not so great. But this plan may backfire on us for my reasoning above....
Personally, I'm also surprised that H would crack the door wide open for arbitrage. This will only fuel the re-seller market further.
Prices in Asia has always been significantly higher than Europe and North America, minimally 30% more. In some countries, it is even greater than 40%, more so now as the Euro has depreciated. About 5-6 years ago, prices at my local stores also moved in annual increases of 8-15% for a few years and I'm curious to see what/where the sales numbers are today.
I agree, Mistikat! And if anyone is looking for some irony in all this, head on over to the price increase thread in the LV forum. People are so sick of it they're planning to jump ship ... to Hermes!
Mindi B, I believe you are correct in your observation that "aspirational" is, in some instances, used in the pejorative, but I believe most of us are referring to the marketing phenomenon of moving up the consumer ladder to the highest rungs in the market, which is a positive development in the world, at least from an economic standpoint.
Old and New should not make a difference: There are plenty of "new money" consumers who are HNW and not aspirational (think Mark Zukerberg or the Kardashian clan) and there are plenty of "old money" consumers who are no longer HNW, or even aspirational.
There are HNW people who do not care about antiques (Kardashian) and those who do not care about luxury goods of any kind (I believe I read that Mr. Zukerberg drives a VW golf)
Likewise, there are the people in the middle who appreciate high end things, whether wine, or handbags, autos or antiques, and will purchase what they can when they can. This is the growing market, but it's growing much faster in certain sectors, like accessories and automobiles.
One of my points was that Hermes and other brands recognized the aspirational market and increased supply to meet demand. Their business strategy today is formed with the aspirational consumer in mind. As you said, the luxury sector must look to this consumer for growth - the consumer with new and growing resources. Settled markets do not provide growth opportunities.
This is very funny!