Alexander Skarsgård

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#11,416
She may have posted it due to it being Valentine's Day and they are not together then had a change of heart about putting it out there? I agree with the comments she would probably love to put stuff on there about him especially with Instagram full of romantic posts today
 
#11,417
I think what most people irk is the fact they never "officially" confirmed their relationship. All people got are pap pics. So then she goes and posts a picture of her "alleged" boyfriend who doesn't like this kind of stuff which she apparently then remembered and took it down again. She knows exactly what kind of people look at her IG and she's dangling Alex like a treat in front of his fans. She's acting like a teenager!
 
#11,418
I think she impulsively put it up because it was so cute and summed up her feelings. Then she had second thoughts because of his preference on social media.

I don't buy that that she posted with the intention of removing it later. And I don't think anyone asked her to take it down either.

It's no secret they're dating, so alluding to it is hardly a revelation for her fans.
 
#11,419
I only saw the screencap posted via Tumblr and thought it was so unlikely/bizarre that it was some fangirl's fevered photoshop job. Then I log on here and see it was actually AC's post?! I can't believe the lack of judgement here.

Whatever she intended, there was one person that it wasn't meant for, and that was her partner, since he's been pretty vehemently clear that he avoids SM and doesn't want to live his personal life in front of a camera. If my partner posted something about me to everyone but me, especially if it was a photo taken without my permission, I'd be pretty upset even if it was supposed to be cutesy. That's some deal-breaking business right there. It's exhibitionist and not about Alex at all - it's about HER. She's proud of her bf? She feels all gooey about him? Fine. Show him off to your friends and family like a normal smitten GF. If you need the attention of millions of strangers to feel good about your relationship, something is screwed up.

What actually disturbs me the most about all of this is something no one else has pointed out - there is ANOTHER person affected by this. The young woman in the picture just had a candid photo of herself circulated to 2.1million+ people by a celebrity basically poking fun at how she appeared in a fraction of a second in her life. Unintended consequences, AC, unintended consequences. How shameful. I hope the young woman can laugh it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donimv
#11,420
Also - totally an aside - Michael Stipe said he, Alex, and Kirsten were "on a kiki." (He wasn't calling Kirsten 'Kiki'). They were having a good ole gossip party. Look up Scissor Sister's "Let's have a kiki" music vid. Lol. We all remember what Alex looks like when he goes full kiki mode...(*cough* Farrah *cough* every Hammarby game ever *cough* Beyond the Pole). :) Love the big goon. Hope he had a good Valentine's Day.
 
#11,421
^ I don't know for sure about what Michael Stipe wrote Kiki ... but at Berlinale is a Swedish film that is called "Kiki" so probably he meant this ;) He wrote it as a name, even someone commented about 'awsome line up'.
 
Last edited:
#11,422
jooa said:
^ I don't know for sure about what Michael Stipe wrote Kiki ... but at Berlinale is a Swedish film that is called "Kiki" so probably he meant this ;) He wrote it as a name, even someone commented about 'awsome line up'.
Click to expand...
Even if he meant they were "on a kiki" at the film "Kiki," his comment and the name of the film are a reference to the common term used in LGTQB communities. (The film looks interesting, btw.)
 
#11,423
^^ I meant the name of a film, not a name some person :)

ETA. About the pic: I'm not that girl, I don't know what she felt when she saw this pic for the first time but it was everywhere form Eonline to Buzzfeed. If my memory isn't that bad ;) I read somewhere even her comment about this meeting and she wrote that she didn't know who he was but some people asked for an autograph, and so she did it too :)
 
Last edited:
#11,424
Ok, so maybe Alexa removed the photo because she became concerned about the privacy of the girl in the shot. Makes more sense than other ideas.

I seriously doubt that Alex has expressly forbidden her to include him in her social media. it's probably more like she knows how he feels about it, and she respects his wishes. I also doubt he would have become angry if the pic had stayed posted. It's cute and Alexa's reaction to it was sweet.
 
#11,426
audiogirl said:
Ok, so maybe Alexa removed the photo because she became concerned about the privacy of the girl in the shot. Makes more sense than other ideas.

I seriously doubt that Alex has expressly forbidden her to include him in her social media. it's probably more like she knows how he feels about it, and she respects his wishes. I also doubt he would have become angry if the pic had stayed posted. It's cute and Alexa's reaction to it was sweet.
Click to expand...

Does anyone know how Alexa was on social media with Alex Turner or any other exes? Because from what I've seen at a quick glance, they seem more okay with it than Alex does, so I do think that it's coming from Alex rather than Alexa protecting his privacy so much.

Her posting the photo of the fan isn't that big of a deal in the whole scheme of things. It's the posting and deleting. It really does come off as immature. She doesn't seem at all secure in what she posts in things that might be deemed a reference to Alex.
 
#11,427
jooa said:
One example of how rumors are created by gossips world:

source: https://www.facebook.com/womansdayn...7112334.285867.83634167333/10154232935942334/
Click to expand...

Well, no-one in Australia or New Zealand would believe it. If you believe Woman's Day or New Idea (both magazines of the same low-rung species) are anything other than works of fiction spiced with a celeb photo here or there - you really need your head read. Those two magazines have been successfully sued by more than one celebrity :laugh:

From Wiki:

Woman's Day was criticised on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's Media Watch, in which it was described as "garbage journalism" for the use of sensationalist headlines and content.[9]
Click to expand...

And New Idea (also called No Idea by people who hate the mag like me)

New Idea revealed details that UK Prince Harry was with the British army serving in Afghanistan, in breach of an agreement with the major news organisations.[6] It ran updates on the story on two further occasions. When the United States Drudge Report ran the story on 28 February 2008, the prince was forced to abandon his posting and return to the UK. After the story broke much more widely, New Idea pulled the story from its web site and made itself unavailable for comment to other members of the press
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
#11,428
Oh she definitely keeps him off her media because of his attitude about it. But I don't think it was some kind of edict from him. It's probably more like something she does because she knows it's his preference. At most he's probably made a simple request about it.

I think she posted it on an impulse, and then changed her mind. But I don't draw much of a conclusion about her from it. Other than it runs counter to her usual posting style to exclude him. So she tripped up and then remedied it.

Btw seeing those trash mags made my day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top