:s
seriously, why are there always debates over who is more "designer" or what brand is "better" than the others...etc? If a person past 20 decides to wear either of these brands that is their choice and maybe what they can afford. I think it has gone far enough to have conversations bashing "low end designers." Not everyone can afford hermes, LV, chanel, burberry, coach, dooney and bourke, juicy couture, whatever...I thought this forum was to talk about the excitement of bags not be so catty as to say which bag is better.
They are both designer bags, they are more expensive and more established than say a walmart bag. But if all a person can afford is a walmart bag, they might be embarrassed about this forum because they can't display because so many might throw "cheap" down their throats. I think we need to be a little more sensitive to people who happen to like juicy or coach bags. Instead of calling them low end maybe we should talk about their positive aspects.
As you can see from the posts in this particular thread some people made comments as follow:
"I have a juicy, but it doesn't look like a juicy."
"I used to not like coach but now I do because of their new lines."
A person shouldn't have to make a defensive comment about their bags. If they like them so be it, but I will say the cattiness is about what bag is better is kind of a shame. I thought we were a place to love bags and discuss quality not bag bashing and hating because something is lower brand.
Not to offend, but just some of the threads are redundant and might offend those if that is all they can afford.