While I agree with you that there exists many universal working conditions that North American's/First World citizens would define as abhorrent, comparing the production processes of ILLEGALLY made products to that of LEGALLY made ones is illogical.
Work environment standards differ across nations due most largely to political, judicial and cultural differences. Setting aside our first world ethnocentric views, we must remember that the production processes in place for Apple, Walmart and other such conglomerates ARE regulated, regardless to what our feelings toward those regulations may be. These products do not fund terrorist activities, employ slave labour tactics and fund human and drug trafficking like the production and sales of ALL counterfeit products.
Setting aside that this is a fashion--specifically purse--forum and a counterfeit bag post, justifying the isolation of the counterfeit handbag industry, your argument is flawed. First, yours is an illogical comparison as you compare legal and illegal working conditions, second, you diminish the counterfeit handbag industry issues to being that of mere working conditions, when that is far from the case. As mentioned, the industry is completely unregulated, takes jobs away from hardworking people, costs billions in tax revenues annually, funds terrorist activities, money laundering, human trafficking and slave labour to name a few of the larger universal problems. Not to mention that the bag you buy at Walmart is NOT an illegal activity, whereas that bag you buy on Canal Street IS an illegal activity!
Please do not attempt to lessen the severity of the counterfeit industry through causal oversimplification.
I don't think I'm casually oversimplifying anything.
1) My post was directed specifically at the comment that a walmart bag was inherently preferable to a fake bag. As a result of the introduction of the specific topic of Walmart, a company known to promote terrible working conditions abroad, I felt it was appropriate to bring up broader issues of production and consumption beyond the scope of counterfeit handbags.
2) You do make a good point about the lost tax revenue in illegal activities. I do wish to point out that Walmart has also engaged in money
laundering, bribery and tax evasion as well. But you are correct, they are in fact regulated to some extent, as they are a US company.
3) Obviously, their off-shore production is another matter. Contrary to your assertion above that "legal" and "regulated" clothing/fashion producers in other countries do not promote human trafficking, that is simply
untrue ( Even supposedly Fair Trade agreements
have been abused). I am not at all convinced that there are marked differences in "legal" and "illegal" practices in many countries that provide our fashion products, including designer handbags, such as the
Prada bags that are produced by the Chinese laborers in unregulated factories in Italy referenced in my earlier post. Or this terrifying story of
a plea for help found in a Saks Fifth Avenue handbag.
4) You note that "Work environment standards differ across nations due most largely to political, judicial and cultural differences." This is correct, but If you think it's "ethnocentric" to say that it's unacceptable to make any people, regardless of their origins, work in unsafe conditions that resemble what the US was like 100 years ago or worse to make our clothes and handbags, then we'll have to agree to disagree on this point.
5) You claim that "legally" produced goods "do not fund terrorist activities, employ slave labour tactics and fund human and drug trafficking like the production and sales of ALL counterfeit products." Clearly, some legally produced goods, including the high end ones cited above, *are* produced with slave labor tactics and human trafficking. Additionally, while I do NOT endorse organized crime, copyright/trademark infringement, or counterfeiting of any sort, there is some evidence that the extent of the links between terrorism and counterfeiting have been
exaggerated by the industries who are harmed by counterfeiting. A 2010
EU funded report even suggests that governments stop wasting their time and $ on policing counterfeit handbags.
If you have evidence that "the production and sales of ALL counterfeit products" fund terrorist activities...and drug trafficking", please share it. I have no doubt that organized crime is tied to these activities, but I tend to be skeptical that "ALL" counterfeit products ever produced anywhere are tied to terrorism and drug trafficking. And as I've shown, human trafficking and slave labor are not confined the the shady world of counterfeits.
Again, I do not believe I am oversimplifying the matter. Indeed, I think when we get hung up on issues of "legal" and "illegal", we may look past the fact that what is "legal" can be as brutal and exploitative as that which is legal. And the fact that we cannot rely on laws or Walmart, or the Gap,or
Prada to ensure that people who make our clothes and bags are treated fairly is an even bigger crime in my opinion.