first off i am not trying to justify use of fake
what i am trying to put forth is that for the govt to take such measures it is very very impossible.
just imagine the ammount of research our authenticators do on each thread to identify a fake and also i see there are experts for each brand of bag.
so i cannot imagine the no. of trained personals required to find a fakes on public places
yes occurences like saks is not a common occurence but it is there
what i am trying to put forth is that for the govt to take such measures it is very very impossible.
just imagine the ammount of research our authenticators do on each thread to identify a fake and also i see there are experts for each brand of bag.
so i cannot imagine the no. of trained personals required to find a fakes on public places
yes occurences like saks is not a common occurence but it is there
I don't think you can compare the two. First of all, the probability of Saks being affected by people returning fakes is extremely small. I don't have facts on that but you can use common sense and figure out that it's not a normal occurrence. Secondly, this is what I meant by what I said previously about people believing only what they want to believe... what happens to be "very very important" issues to some (funding terrorism and child labor) just doesn't comprehend to others. I find it a bit sad that people who know better still try to justify using a fake for the sake of frugality, fashion, whatever they want to call it.