Bespoke — Jane Waterous
Jane Waterous, who is an artist famous for her colourful paintings, has decided to paint LV bags with the same 3-D figures. The bags can't be worn but are meant to be displayed as art. What do you think?

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
This would be an erroneous assumption. Art market is, and will remain, distinct from handbag stuff. Murakami (a much more prominent artist) has fine artworks in the six figures plus, some in the millions (USD)--but you can buy any Murakami limited LV item for a tiny fraction of that--and it's not of interest to art collectors.Her canvas art sells for approximately $20 000 USD on average (roughly 24" x 24" canvas). I'm assuming having this art on the LV bags significantly increases the value of the bag because they are probably considered as art.
Unlike Murakami, she isn't doing a collaboration with LV. In this case, she is using the bags as a canvas for her art. It's the same art she puts on regular canvas. Someone who loves both LV and her art would pay the art price for these bags.This would be an erroneous assumption. Art market is, and will remain, distinct from handbag stuff. Murakami (a much more prominent artist) has fine artworks in the six figures plus, some in the millions (USD)--but you can buy any Murakami limited LV item for a tiny fraction of that--and it's not of interest to art collectors.
It's speculation, literally, since there's no track record on this with LV for any fine artist.Someone who loves both LV and her art would pay the art price for these bags.
In this particular case, the art market is not distinct from the handbag.
It's speculation, literally, since there's no track record on this with LV for any fine artist.
What is known about whether she's using authentic LV items? The website is silent on this.
This is a great point. Almost all painters who paint on Vuittons are applied artists who personalise existing items for the clients. And that is a very different thing than this. Also that kind of personalisation has a long history and tradition in the community. For more than a century now.It's speculation, literally, since there's no track record on this with LV for any fine artist.
Some people paid 36k for the Bad Luck Brian meme as an NFT, and some other paid more than half a million (!!!) for the Nyan Catthese figures don't turn any of those into art
This is just a weird and misfired marketing stunt, it won't resonate with Vuitton enthusiasts.
I am honestly curious. Would be nice to know in a year from now if this campaign was successful or not.Clearly the buyer has to be someone who both loves her art and loves LV. They clearly exist but maybe not in this thread![]()