Thoughts on well-used bags?

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I am fine with slouch and wear that I myself add to a new bag over its lifetime. About buying preloved, I almost exclusively don't anymore. I learned a big lesson with my last vintage bag: there's wear, and there's too much wear. Sometimes you don't know until you've bought the thing. The fine line between them is subtle, but I can tell when a bag says, "I gave up."
 
  • Insightful
Reactions: 880
It depends on the leather type, bag, and the type of wear. I love the look of well-worn, natural leather, but it needs to be clean and the patina even. I ease up in the rotation when I start to see signs of structural impact though, like stretching or scuffing that can't be maintained through leather conditioner and buffing though.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 880
I LOVE a good worn in bag but not a dirty one. I have an OLD Bal that looks like I threw it under my Jeep and backed over it a few times. I love it. (Except the zippers separate and drive me nuts).

But it does depend on the bag. Something structured wouldn't look as good worn.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 880
I agree, I think what bugged me the most about the Trapeze was how structured it's supposed to be, whereas my redyed PS1 just looks like a vintage school bag from the slouchyness. Also quite an interesting case with the Cabas ChYc, because from what I understand it's also supposed to be structured, but the sheepskin is just naturally saggy when compared to the stiffer textured leather.

At this point I'm very confident about redyeing bags to black, but I think it should be a super last resort kind of thing because 80% of the time I'd like to preserve as much as the original leather and finish as much as possible.
Yes, exactly! My Proenza is quite 'relaxed,' especially the straps on the flap. But I don't mind that, it looks good on this bag. My Prada Saffiano tote, however, sports a few scratches and some corner wear and it isn't as structured as it once was, and that's about how far I'm willing to take it. When I'm not wearing it (which is most of the time after the pandemic hit...) I keep it stuffed so that it doesn't lose more of its shape. I never really handled the Cabas ChYc (unfortunately :) It's a beautiful bag,) but I think it's the kind of style that's sort of in the middle... It sags quite charmingly. IMO, it looks great when it's new and just as great when it's slouchy.

I personally wouldn't dye any of my bags or buy one that's been dyed, even by a professional. I feel like the leather is just isn't the same after this procedure. Perhaps I've just come across poorly dyed ones, so YMMV, of course :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: 880
I buy 90% preloved. There is a big difference between worn out and worn in. I'm ok with bags that are lightly worn in with gentle use, but worn corners and dirty linings and leather cracking are a huge turnoff. Some unstructured and soft leathers (like older Bals) are supposed to look more worn so I try to always look at older bags from brands to see how they're supposed to age.
 
Oh that's also an interesting point! Do you think you'd be more inclined to use the bag more often when it's had some wear and tear as compared to something totally pristine?
That's a good question. Finding some wear (from me) made me actually treat them with more care and use them more occasionally because I do want to keep them beautiful. To me they're wearable works of art, and I wouldn't want to trash a Picasso. So they've become more special occasion bags, definitely in use but not knockabout bags either ;-)
 
I think there are certain bags that look better a bit beat up and worn in, kinda like a pair of Chuck Taylors.

I think Chucks look way too square when they’re brand spanking new. I think for bags a bit of fading, or a quilted bag that’s a bit deflated are fine, but handle warming to me looks… kinda gross. I’d love to find a new-to-me Balenciaga RH First, but so many of the lighter colours have that handle warming and it kills the look of the bag, IMHO.

I agree with this. When I bought my Miu Miu mini bow, I knew I wanted it to be pre-loved because to me, that style bag just looks so nice even when it's a bit worn.

For my Chanel classic WOC GHW, I bought it from the boutique, but I don't think I would have bought it preloved unless it was in superb condition because it feels much more formal and structured. Creases or scuffs wouldn't suit it very well.

For my Chanel boy RHW, it's an edgier looking bag already and the RHW has an aged feel. I know that boy bags tend to get a lot of scuffs around the edges even if you're very careful, so for this bag, I was actually relieved to buy one that already has some wear. This way, I wouldn't have to go through the horror of noticing it go from brand new to a bit scuffed (I usually won't buy a bag if I have to baby it; it has to be extra special). I also got an amazing deal so, for me, it was worth it to be a little worn to get a discount. TBH, I don't even notice the scuffs unless I get up close and really look for them.

I feel like I kind of embrace the well-used look for everyday bags but would dislike it for more formal bags :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farkvam
I buy 90% preloved. There is a big difference between worn out and worn in. I'm ok with bags that are lightly worn in with gentle use, but worn corners and dirty linings and leather cracking are a huge turnoff. Some unstructured and soft leathers (like older Bals) are supposed to look more worn so I try to always look at older bags from brands to see how they're supposed to age.

Yes, good point! Dirty lining is a dealbreaker for me, just seems so gross :sick:
 
For me I tend to go for pebbled / textured leather because I think they can go for longer without showing significant signs of age. I do have smooth leather bags and I tend to baby them. I can’t stand heavily-scratched and creased smooth leather and scratches are inevitable for me because I have long nails :lol:. I do keep a milk crate full of leather dyes, cleansers, moisturizers, stain repellents, etc. to do my own rehabbing and maintenance if needed.

I’ve tried to buy preloved and if I can’t clean and moisturizer the scuffs and marks away, I sell them. Something about I don’t know where the wear came from bothers me deep down. I’d rather buy new and know how the wear and tear came to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OCMomof3
I actively wear all my bags and I actively care for my bags.

I absolutely won’t carry a bag that’s dirty or lost structure. Nor will I carry a bag in need of significant repair (obvious scratches, etc.) These bags get touched up / repaired to like new or sold.

I will deal with normal wear and tear - very minor scratches or rubbing that can’t be seen from a normal distance. But, even with those I’ll do maintenance/ get them serviced to get as close to new looking as possible.

I like taking care of all my things well because I get optimum enjoyment. I don’t drive a dirty car, have a messy home, go out with my hair a mess, etc. My things don’t own me by any stretch - they serve me. So, I want the best experience possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OCMomof3
I purchased 4/5 bags directly from the retailer this year and 1/5 new with tags from a reseller, and that is typically the only way I buy something pre-loved anymore. I don’t want to buy a bag that already looks worn (misshapen, creased, obvious flaws, etc.) and I definitely can’t do dirty linings or odors. Normal wear and tear doesn’t bother me as much when I’m the cause of it.
 
When i go preloved I look for really worn out bags as long as there are no rips and cracks and i just have them restored. It saves me money. I bought a worn out LV bosphore with rubbed edges and still havent had it restored. I still use it to this day.
 
I stopped buying Mulberry from about 2010ish, at the point when they started using microfibre linings to pad out skinny leathers, and raised their prices to crazy levels. It’s a shame, the leathers used to be beautiful.
I think any brand once it gets popular they thin the leather or materials. The materials goes up too so they take it out in their production and up the price which is so unfair for us consumers. Its the same with anything even with food in restaurant. They serve smaller and pricier. In jewelry they thin out the gold too. It happens to everything!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVSXOXO
Top