At least her first nude is artsy lol! That magazine cover isn't artsy though!![]()
Its not her first nude pic.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
At least her first nude is artsy lol! That magazine cover isn't artsy though!![]()
purely on the artistic value and aesthetic, this is a beautiful photo. It's classic and a great example of a good artistic nude.
She should cover her face and her body. No need to see either. Pathetic, sad, worst one of them all. She and Scott. What a piece of work. And her kids get to watch their mutually abusive relationship on tv one day! Great Mom. Oh yeah, they also get to watch her exploit her family, and pretend to be a victim.
She should cover her face because it always has a mean and sour expression and is hard to look at. Covering her body has nothing to do with her kids. My objection is her incredible thirst for exploiting whatever she has- her body, her kids, her bad relationships.Well that's a bit excessive... Why should she cover her body AND her face? I find tasteful nude photos to be fine, but overly sexualized ones are not.
This isn't directed at your opinion, but just in general. People often complain that mothers shouldn't do things like this because they have children. So, mothers shouldn't live after they have kids? As long as it's tastefully done, I don't see a problem with it. Kids are going to see and hear things regardless, whether it's from you or peers at school.
I did. Thatnk you. I am sure you do too once in a while.Tell us how you really feel.