Kitty: this whole leather thing is very complex. The more I have tried to research
leather, the more I learn but the more confusing it becomes. We have to understand
if the leather is full grain, top grain, just 'genuine leather' or even some
composite (I call that baloney leather.... leather bits mixed with chemicals and
extruded into sheets of leather.)
Even withing full grain, there are differences in quality and thickness.
Then there is the processing of the leather.... is the surface smoothed or sanded?
Is it embossed to look pebbled or like ostrich or crosshatched like in saffiano/
Then is it coated in some way?
Very often leather is softened in processing.... it can be stretched, tumbled,
or chemically treated. So a thin piece of leather, may be like glove leather,
may seem lux, but it may not be well suited to handbag use in terms of
durability or function. A thicker piece of soft leather might be just fine
in some handbag designs.
i think that most of the coated leathers I have seen, like saffiano and some
of the smooth leathers, are thinner pieces of leather (top grain?).
That makes them lighter. But what does it say about the quality of the leather?
And very few handbag brands give us enough info. Lots of the descriptions,
where they exist, use marketing terminology or generic language.
Foe example, pebbled leather just describes the surface of the leather.
It doesn't tell you what kind of leather it is, or how it has been processed,
or if the pebbling is an embossing. Dooney original All Weather Leather
was pebbled. But they achieved the texture by shrinking the leather.
The result was a very thick and heavy piece of leather. A very durable
leather. Much of the pebbled
leather collections today achieve the pebbled texture by embossing pieces
of leather. That leather can be thick (as in the Dillion collection) or much
thinner, as in the styles just identified as pebbled leather.
Even when I try to understand some of the top handbag brands, like Hermes,
I don't get a clear picture of the difference of the different leathers.
Maybe they are all the highest quality? Maybe some are better
than others? I am very much a novice in this area.
On top of all of that, there is the question of individual taste and
functional requirements. I've had beautiful thick soft leather
slouchy handbags that didn't work for me. Friends who inherited them
think they are fabulous. I agree, the leather was great and soft and the
style was beautiful.... it just didn't work for me!
Regarding the Dawson, it is a smooth leather, but I don't think it's a
smoushy leather. The design is very much like the Brenna and the Barlow,
which have also been done in many different leathers. The pliability of
the leather allows it to be adapted to the design of the bag. The structure
bag comes from the construction. I don't think the thickness or thinness of the
leather will affect the slouchyness of the bag very much.
The leather in the Dawson may be waxed or lightly coated, I don't remember.
But it's not heavily coated and doesn't feel plasticy like some coated canvas
or saffiano.
Most leather soften with use, even coated leather like saffiano.
Disclaimer: These days I rotate thru a large number of different handbags so
none of them get enough use to show the benefits or ravages of
lots of wear.
I admit to being a geek about specifications and details.... in jewelry
and diamonds and handbags to understand these things.
Many of my friends say if they like the look and think it's worth the price,
then it's not important to delved into the specs. (These are highly educated
and generally very smart people). With so much misinformation and the
difficulty of getting 'the facts' and the complexity of these subjects it's
easy to go down the rabbit hole and either end up confused or only wanting
to buy the very, very, very best. Since most of us don't have that kind
of budget, we all need to evaluate things in the way that makes the most
sense to us.
In any class of products there is always a range of quality. If you know what the
top is, but can't or won't buy it due to cost, are you disappointed when you get
something you know isn't the best, but is very good? Or would you rather just
get what you like and can afford, and not delve into the underlying quality
and value? I've seen this go both ways when someone is shopping for an engagement
ring. Everyone has to make trade-offs between cost and size of stone and quality
of the diamond, not to mention style preferences.
Handbags can be even more confusing, since there are no industry standards to
judge quality of the leather objcetively, like there are for diamonds.