TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Sorry, I do believe Blurred Lines is a straight up copy....Happy and Aint that Peculiar....not so much.
TMZ mashed up Happy and Aint that Peculiar instrumentals and it's the same song! Wow. Now I can hear the similarities....
http://www.tmz.com/2015/03/13/marvin-gaye-blurred-lines-happy-lawsuit-pharell/
As a fan of Marvin Gaye I recognised it straight away. It's one thing to sample a song, it's quite another to base your entire tune on someone else's work and deny the source
That's a mashup right? Neither songs are really unique in terms of structure. I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that they're the same songs.
The 'Blurred Lines' one was a little more obvious, but I still don't agree with the judge's verdict because it just sounds like they were very much inspired by Marvin Gaye. Also, I think I read somewhere that back then, copyright did not include the beat, just the lyrics and melodies. I can imagine it being that way because there are some genres in which songs just have a lot of highly similar repercussions.
Lawsuits like this one are tricky because I think it kind of scares songwriters off to do something like a throw-back soul song, in fear of it sounding too much like another song.