TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Sure Palin can look great, she had the donors paying for all her clothing. I would be quite upset if I had made contributions that ended up at Saks or NM. Either party, would make no difference!
^^Then maybe Swanky will explain the part of your post she had to edit out?
After the campaign Palin donated the clothing to charity!Sure Palin can look great, she had the donors paying for all her clothing. I would be quite upset if I had made contributions that ended up at Saks or NM. Either party, would make no difference!
FYI I was letting you know since you clearly want to show unflattering pictures of Palin, that there was a reason she was dressing that way.FYI, in my posts, I made no judgment of the pics or why she was wearing them in any of my posts.
I was posting fairly recent pics of her, not ones decades old and that is it.
Nor did I mention anything about a stylist, or attack her for wearing these.
That is a political bash on Palin.actually if you want to know the part of my post swanky edited out here it is in its EXACT words. I did not make any judgments about her.
I said "actually more than $150, 000 close to $180, 000" That is it!
Only a number with no mention of politics! AND YES THAT GOT DELETED!
That is what Swanky deleted and that was in reference to the previous poster above mine who asked if Palin had spent more than $100,000 in recent months on clothes, and if so she is bound to look good.
So before you start insinuating I was bashing Palin and that part got deleted. Know what the truth is.
Agreed.^whatever's been going on in the last few pages are thinly veiled political bashes.. I also enjoy seeing everyone's pics. Let's just get back to the fashion?
That is a political bash on Palin.
FYI I was letting you know since you clearly want to show unflattering pictures of Palin, that there was a reason she was dressing that way.
socaltrojan, please keep your political bias out of this forum so it will stay open.