Needed: Diamond Opinion! 1.71 ct but...

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

It's beautiful! Esp since you've looked at so many rings, it sounds like your heart has already made a choice. I think a warmer stone would be more suited to a rose gold setting anyway...an L would probably only be a bit less optimal in a white setting but even then it's a matter of taste. In regards to the wedding bands, many women (including myself) don't have exactly matching bands. Mine for instance has stones all the way around and is in 18k WG (separate story about how we couldn't get plat), and DH's is a matte platinum with only a few small diamonds.
 
this is my current ring. It is 1.50 cttw g-h si I do love it it sparkles beautifully in the right light and esp the sun, but is flat in all other light. And while I do love this ring, every time I look at it it doesnt feel like a wedding ring whats worse is I picked it out:confused1: Funny how as we get a little older our tastes keep changing. So this new ring with a matching band would be a drastic change (improvement)...
 

Attachments

  • DSC00189.JPG
    DSC00189.JPG
    40 KB · Views: 85
My husband and I don't have matching wedding bands. His is yellow gold and mine is white.

Keep us posted on the ring. It is a big decision for sure. I love the rose gold but just give it a ton of thought before you go that path. You may love it today but what about down the road. A stone that color will really be limited (in my opinion) to a rose/yellow setting....so, if you change your mind and want a re-set, you may have a problem.

I am 33 now. Already on my second wedding set (same center stone). My taste has changed over the years and I love that I can play around with the setting and eternity bands. So many options to try..........and it is so easy since my center stone goes with anything.
 
Wow! That is great info and a fantastic review of a diamond I am less familiar with thank you so much. I am curious is that your diamond in your avatar and what color is it?

hi baglady-shoefly. i'm not ericaD, but i do know that her gorgeous diamond is a 3ct vintage asscher...L VS. :graucho:

i think that ring you have your eye on is breathtaking! :nuts:
 
Wow! That is great info and a fantastic review of a diamond I am less familiar with thank you so much. I am curious is that your diamond in your avatar and what color is it? I really have a crush on this ring I have looked at prob over 100+ others, but this is the 1 I keep coming back too. I think the warm stone is only made even more beautiful by the pink gold, but she is a beauty unto herself.:D

That's my new asscher! It's a 3.00ct, GIA certed L, VS2. It's off in NY being set into a 5 stone by Leon Mege, with traps and bullets on the sides. It will be ready in about 2 weeks! :yahoo:

I have lots of pics of lower colored stones (all antique cuts) in the K/L/M range that I'd be happy to share. Maybe I should start a new thread - show me your lower colors?
 
And for what it's worth, lower colors look great in yellow and rose gold, but also in white metals too. I'm setting my L in platinum with K colored side stones. SLURP.
 
And for what it's worth, lower colors look great in yellow and rose gold, but also in white metals too. I'm setting my L in platinum with K colored side stones. SLURP.

I think that thread would be a great idea! I would also love to see your other stones. And I cannot wait to see you new stone set:nuts: It will be stunning!!
 
I love warmer colours in pictures too... in real life though, not so much. A close up picture, especially with nice photography, makes the diamond look quite different than to the naked eye in real life. Don't mean to be a party pooper, just make sure you've seen a certified L in real life before making your mind up. :yes:

And whatever you choose, please post lots of pics when you get it so we can drool!
 
Regardless of colour, D to M or beyond, I'd advise looking at a certed stone in real life to get the best idea. Let's face it, it's thousands of dollars. Not to mention a sentimental piece of jewellery. A bit of extra research is well worth it. I notice that posters on sites like pricescope.com very often advise newbies to sacrifice colour for some size. But taking this advice would've been disaster for me - some people (most even, given that the whiter the stone the more valuable) actually prefer colourless. I was really quite shocked how different the stones looked in real life. And I'd viewed many of the videos on your website of your stones EricaD. Lovely, by the way! Maybe the OP discovers she loves warm stones, great, but she'll then have the knowledge of being 100% thrilled with her chioce. Second guessing a purchase like this would put a total dampener on the whole experience. It's a large purchase, no need to rush.

Just putting a perspective out there I wish I had've read back when I was first learning. :flowers:
 
I would go with the L color. That's a beautiful diamond and what counts is whether you like it or not. Cut can make a diamond more beautiful than color. I say go for that beauty!
 
It's very true, but many online vendors have good return policies, so there's nothing to fear in buying a low color so you can see it in person. It's not easy to find well cut low colors in local stores - antique cuts, yes, if you find a good dealer you can see them in person, but modern RB's and other shapes are harder to find and you may have to buy online to get a good specimen.

I believe the L in question is through a vendor I know to have a good return policy. Double check, but if that's the case, I say go for it so that you can see the ring in person. If you're not in love, send it back and try again.

A dealer (or maybe he was a cutter?) on PS once posted that he routinely sets loose stones in front of buyers, unmarked, in a range of colors. He then asks them to identify the one that's prettiest to their eye. 9/10 times they choose a lower color. But they have a hard time buying the lower color they like because they have been conditioned to think colorless is better. Personally, I feel they are all beautiful! But I really get feisty when people insist that one color is superior to another (not that anyone here has done that, I just mean in general).

All I ask is that people buy what's beautiful to them. For some, colorless is more beautiful and for others, nothing beats a nicely cut M. It's very personal.

One tangent: when I got my L asscher I showed it to several friends. Every one of them said something along the lines of: "It must be a really high quality stone because the color is so pretty. Why don't all diamonds look like this? Why is it so colorful?" and the answer is the L color and that the stone is cut to ideal asscher proportions. I then point out that it's a low color and the reaction is usually, "Oh, so it's not a good diamond?" yet I can see the doubt written on their faces because their eyes are telling them it's beautiful, but they are conditioned to think whiter is better.

If it was a D color, it would perform differently and appeal to different tastes. Is a D more rare? In nature, yes. But what about what you see in circulation every day? I say a beautifully cut L is rarer in day-to-day life than D-F stones. This is a reflection of demand, but doesn't change the fact that an L will be more rare and is perceived by most to be as beautiful as any higher color stone. But you gotta love the look, the body color/tint, etc.
 
Last edited:
The ring looks stunning. I love that it is in rose gold and has pink diamonds which I think enhance the L color. If you are ordering it and can return and get your money back I think you order the ring and see it in person.
 
I have found that with lower colors, people either love them immensely or find it's not for them at all. I will never own a diamond above K color, personally, because I think K/L/M (my personal sweet spot) stones are the most visually beautiful. You may feel differently. Remember, color is simply a reflection of rarity and demand (in part due to marketing, I believe) but higher colors are in no way better or superior than lower colors - they are all beautiful in their own right and will appeal to different people.

I have found that the light play from lower colors is really mesmerizing and very different from colorless stones. There's something so rich and warm and exotic looking about them. I think it's a beautiful ring but you have to love it for what it is. An L is an L and will look like an L - it will never look like a colorless. You have to embrace it for what it is and flaunt it!
:goodpost: I couldn't agree more.

in fact, I think a lower color stone looks BETTER in RG...much better than an icy white stone. then when you consider the pink diamonds, I'd absolutely jump at that L diamond. it will look stunning. maybe you could get a pink sapphire anniv band in RG for your wedding band.

also, I don't think that the color of the metal in your rings has to match your DH's at all. be free to express yourself.

can't wait to hear what you decide!!!
 
Top