One thing for sure, this dress won't be iconic the way JLo's and Elizabeth Hurley's dresses did.
Meagan Good is engaged
- Thread starter Sassys
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Her husband does not seem to mind
. I am sure he loved the looks his wife was getting! Some men like parading their wives around! And while I do agree it was the BET awards she should have shown a little more tack and common sense! She could have worn that to an after party! And I bet you big $$$ she was not wearing any undies either!
I don't have a problem with deep cleavage. preacher's wife or not. but that dress looked super cheap and just bad.
This. This dress looks like it's made from a stretch polyester, at best. That's why it offers no coverage.
JLo's dress was Versace, and presumably layered transparent silk or at least a high-quality rayon. Plus, it was a print. This means her nipples and aureolas weren't visible through the dress. (She probably had the grace to wear pasties, but even if she hadn't, they wouldn't have been as visible as this lady's.)
When I have to bust out the Latin anatomy terms to describe what's showing through a garment, I would venture to say the wearer has gone a little too far.
I've seen tattooed eyebrows that look better than hers. In a natural looking tattoo, individual hairs are drawn. Megan's are basically stamps.
I remember J-Lo getting relentlessly ridiculed for wearing shower curtain. Obviously it didn't do her career any harm, on the contrary. Maybe in the long run the old saying 'There is no such thing as bad press', will be applicable for Meagan too.
I don't know... She's just sharing what the good lord gave her!
If thats what the good lard gave her. I seen a lot of saggy looking implants, so could fake for all we know.
Beyond that the dress just looks cheap.
the dress is definitely cheap looking... Although I know I have seen gowns that look almost exactly like this in Cavalli, for example
