I obviously bought into the hype and branding of Chanel. Shame on me. I was totally down with the idea that a contemporary bag wasn't an "investment." Well, if you love and use your bags to death, why do you need to get good resell out of it? And if these bags are so spectacular, why are they always on the pre-loved market?
Now, I carry brands like Longchamp and MZWallace. And I'm just as happy and just as awesome as I would be with Hermes.
Agreed; all my premier bags (except for two Mulberry one LV) were all purchased unused from the secondary market. Good thing about being able to self-authenticate, is to be privy to great discounts! Love the contemporary bags; many have quality that really comes close (if not exceed) their premier counterparts! When I placed my LV and Kate Spade madison ave tote side by side, the latter just feels more substantial; had I not know about the brands, I'd totally think it's the more expensive one.
Of course, the LV is canvas and KS leather, so it's sort of comparing apples and oranges, but at the price point...nope. As much as I like the shape of that LV, nothing about it (to me at least) really justifies being more than 4x the price as the Kate Spade. The KS madison ave bag is apparently made in Spain; makes it feel more lux I suppose, yet there are lots of LV MIF that don't live up to expectations. Guess the customer does have to be smart in purchasing decisions, and do the homework to decide his/her comfort zone.