Kim Kardashian

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#36,752
Sasha2012 said:
Kim Kardashian was in a dark mood on Friday, at least when it came to her choice of attire.

The mother-of-two stepped out in Beverly Glen in an all-black outfit and gave onlookers a generous glimpse of her cleavage in a plunging bodysuit.

The 36-year-old star was joined by sisters Khloe and Kourtney as they went to lunch at Fabrocinis restaurant before picking up a froyo treat at the Deli.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...lashes-boob-busty-tank-top.html#ixzz4dbikdrvz

3F0DA21700000578-4391944-image-a-50_1491601120942.jpg

3F0DA33300000578-0-image-a-23_1491599015778.jpg

3F0DCA1D00000578-4391944-Time_for_dessert_-m-67_1491601518008.jpg

3F0DC9F500000578-4391944-image-m-49_1491600948355.jpg
Click to expand...

Had to zoom in on the first and last picture to be sure of what I was seeing. At first I thought she was losing her hair because her part was so large but then realized that's not her real hair. The top of that wig is balding and she is wearing 53059403 bobby pins on the side? Time to get a new one. The outfit itself I kind of like.
 
#36,755
Oh lord does she actually have a mirror at home?? and her face looks extra plastic

and her last pose screams "Make sure to take a good shot of my diaper a$s"
 

Attachments

  • dew.jpg
    dew.jpg
    116.3 KB · Views: 824
  • fe.jpg
    fe.jpg
    66.3 KB · Views: 842
  • fefre.jpg
    fefre.jpg
    142.1 KB · Views: 876
  • g.jpg
    g.jpg
    103.7 KB · Views: 916
  • r.jpg
    r.jpg
    65.3 KB · Views: 935
#36,760
Stansy said:
Cleopatra wannabe?
Click to expand...
haha good one well she did a cleopatra photoshoot back in the days, maybe shes just reminiscing? and while checking the photoshoot pics I found this, god she fu*ked up her face
 

Attachments

  • ec7a3ece3196ca28f07e57d1cac9a641.jpg
    ec7a3ece3196ca28f07e57d1cac9a641.jpg
    82.5 KB · Views: 972
  • kim-kardashian-harpers-bazaar-march-cover-cleopatra-020911-2.jpg
    kim-kardashian-harpers-bazaar-march-cover-cleopatra-020911-2.jpg
    935.2 KB · Views: 829
  • Like
Reactions: melbo, Chubbs1212, Rosy's Luxury Closet and 8 others
#36,764
Deco said:
If you thought that same post would have been well received by me but for the exclamations, you're mistaken. The post happened to have exclamations, but I could have just as easily said "Bible verse riddled" or "poetry riddled" or "sad face riddled". I reacted to the face of a broadcast social media post, which by definition is a difficult medium for expressing oneself, as a way of announcing you 17 month old's death. You came out saying "you don't understand black people", so you exhaust yourself. I would have understood the examples you posted. Just not rushing announcing death of your 17 month old the day of on social media. I too have a 17 month old. Sorry you don't want to hear anyone else's reaction but yours.
Click to expand...
I didn't have the energy to be articulate in that post....so if what you read was that I don't want to hear anyone else's reaction but my own then I'll eat it...no skin. I only tried to add another layer to the "omg exclamations"/"how can one use exclamations" outrage and not the posting on social media. Had the post contained something I didn't have context for, I wouldn't have provided context. Simple. Having a 17 month old gave you a perspective same as understanding the phrase gave me a perspective. If you took it as solely directed at you then I can't help that because I don't believe I quoted any one person originally nor was I responding to the timing of the post.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top