did you guys notice the baby's dress had a corset in the front.... smdh...
Yeah. smh. Klassy as always.
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
did you guys notice the baby's dress had a corset in the front.... smdh...
Great post for your 12,000th!I always find it so interesting when folks mention the 50s as this wonderful period or that being PC ruined things. To me, it usually translates that the real loss is that one can no longer directly speak in a derogatory manner to people without consequences or now has to tolerate different unlike the 50s. (I don't think this is what poopsie means as the topic is a little girls outfit). I just find the whole difference in perspective very interesting and it always triggers my ear.
I specifically didn't charge you with saying the 50s were nifty...just want to make that clear. I understood your sentiment hence not quoting. And I totally agree, PC speak is in fact mind control. All that matters though in terms of PC language is if one is the speaker or receiver of what's being said.I never said that the 50's were all that nifty. I just happened to be North's age during the latter part of them. I don't have kids---or haven't been around any, but from what I have observed that fairy princess stage is pretty ubiquitous for little girls of a certain age.
I am certainly no defender of Kakes, but I never jumped to the conclusion that she was grooming North to be Bondage Bettina with the dress
As for PC.........IMO it is a form of mind control and so much more complex than no longer being 'allowed' to speak in a derogatory manner sans consequences.
I remember being younger wearing babydoll dresses with t-shirts underneath. I wouldn't dress my child in North's clothing either but that's mainly because I feel kids should be allowed to be kids as long as possible. However, looking at IG many folks are all about dressing their children like mini-adults.Although I most certainly wouldn't dress my future child the way Kim and Ye choose to, the corsets and satin dresses don't bother me too much because she always has a t-shirt and shorts underneath them.
I do like that they don't dress her in the usual pink, frilly, 'girlie' type of clothing.
I always find it so interesting when folks mention the 50s as this wonderful period or that being PC ruined things. To me, it usually translates that the real loss is that one can no longer directly speak in a derogatory manner to people without consequences or now has to tolerate different unlike the 50s. (I don't think this is what poopsie means as the topic is a little girls outfit). I just find the whole difference in perspective very interesting and it always triggers my ear.
I saw some this morning when I was shopping in Big W (a discount department store here in Australia).Whatever happened with their Kardashian Kids line? Is it still in production or did it go the way of all their other products?
OFTLOG what is wrong with a little girl wearing a bodice?
Back in the dark ages ----aka the 50's (before political correctness took over and ruined the world) I wore dresses like that. They were based on fairy tale princesses and nursery rhymes like Snow White and Bo Peep. It was a short lived phase to be sure but leotards, tutus and my dance recital outfits were the only things I wanted to wear.
OFTLOG what is wrong with a little girl wearing a bodice?
Back in the dark ages ----aka the 50's (before political correctness took over and ruined the world) I wore dresses like that. They were based on fairy tale princesses and nursery rhymes like Snow White and Bo Peep. It was a short lived phase to be sure but leotards, tutus and my dance recital outfits were the only things I wanted to wear.
I remember being younger wearing babydoll dresses with t-shirts underneath. I wouldn't dress my child in North's clothing either but that's mainly because I feel kids should be allowed to be kids as long as possible. However, looking at IG many folks are all about dressing their children like mini-adults.