Juste Un Clou Bracelet (JUC) Discussion

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

#1,981
cherylc said:
thank you for sharing all your pics! or rather cartier should thank you since you are drumming up interest and future sales i think. lol

i was wondering how easily it snapped back in place after prying it open? because it does seem weird if it’s solid gold that it can move back like elastic. very interesting!!

i’m now debating which one to buy! the price is def attractive on the small one and it’s so super cute!

i’m not sure when i don’t like the thin love but like the thin JUC. i guess maybe the proportions just work better for the JUC to be smaller?
Click to expand...
I'm based in Asia. My sa had to request it from head office who had them to put together sales ads.
karly9 said:
Thank you so much for the detailed photos! I quite like the thin JUC since most of my pieces are delicate and I can see how this would be a beautiful stacking piece, but I really hope it comes with diamonds for a little extra sparkle.

Wonder if the bendy mechanism would predispose the bracelet to damage if the point got caught on something.

Where are you located? Anyone been able to try on a sample in the US yet? Can't wait to see these in person.
Click to expand...
I think I don't particularly love the thin juc, it's just the price point thats attractive and I would only consider it since I have thin love and the thin Love doesnt look so thin next to the thin juc. All about proportions. The two just look nice together so I'm hoping for one with some diamonds. As a standalone juc, I would still prefer the thicker one.

I think this def doesnt feel as fragile as the t wire bracelet where over time the two t dont align. The material is still thicker than that. I think it's a piece one needs to try on to feel it and decide if it's worth it. It goes back to its shape right after u pry it open, because of the oval design, it takes some practice to open and put it on one's wrist. I don't think it's delicate or that it'll bend out of shape overtime but I did only spend 10 min with it. So I'm not sure how easily it'll get caught when putting on or taking off clothes. Think I would just err on the caution side and put it on after I'm dressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monaliceke, WingNut, Violet Bleu and 1 other person
#1,982
I guess i'll be the outlier here and say that I don't like the thin version at all after see the photo how it's put it. I love the ease of use of the regular version, but seeing how I have to bend (and possibly break) the bracelet to put on each time, I'm going to stay away from it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: L etoile and kate2828
#1,983
oshinex said:
I guess i'll be the outlier here and say that I don't like the thin version at all after see the photo how it's put it. I love the ease of use of the regular version, but seeing how I have to bend (and possibly break) the bracelet to put on each time, I'm going to stay away from it.
Click to expand...

this is a real concern since i would want to take it off and on every day and i would be scared it would get warped over time. and i don’t think i would want to wear a JUC 24/7 like the love.
 
#1,985
I think the proportions actually look a bit off on the smaller juc bracelet, the nail head is too small, like someone else pointed out! I like the trend of more delicate jewelry though. I have never owned a JUC, they have never called to me. But I do love the small Loves!
 
  • Like
Reactions: kate2828 and L etoile
#1,986
Hello everyone. I just want to come in here and say that I have a Tiffany Hardwear bracelet that I wear 24/7. It is flexible, and does get caught on things sometimes. Although, I can just detach it from whatever it’s caught on, and it goes right back into shape. There was one time that I was playing with the bending mechanism and kind of deformed my bracelet. I was able to take it into Tiffany, and they had no problem fixing it quite easily. If this Thin JUC is thicker than the Tiffany bracelet, then I don’t see how there could ever be any real problems with it. I think assuming the worst is not ideal. Cartier would not release a piece that did not live up to the quality level that we have come to expect from a luxury brand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpezmom
#1,987
While I have the diamond-tipped JUC, I'm interested in the full pave. I was hoping that the thin JUC would be available in full pave and would fill the void for the regular pave JUC at a lower price. Unfortunately, I think that the full pave regular JUC is still the one that I want. The thin one just seems like a budget option. I normally like very thin jewelry (and prefer the thin Love to the regular), but not this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsmtl and KSweet101
#1,988
L etoile said:
While I have the diamond-tipped JUC, I'm interested in the full pave. I was hoping that the thin JUC would be available in full pave and would fill the void for the regular pave JUC at a lower price. Unfortunately, I think that the full pave regular JUC is still the one that I want. The thin one just seems like a budget option. I normally like very thin jewelry (and prefer the thin Love to the regular), but not this one.
Click to expand...

At the same time, if you notice the regular JUC pave, it's only pave halfway through the bracelet, while the bottom half is solid gold - I was told that the regular JUC doesn't have pave diamonds all the way due to the hinge mechanism - I have a feeling if they do release a thin pave JUC it would be full diamonds all around which would be cool!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsmtl
#1,989
ani108 said:
At the same time, if you notice the regular JUC pave, it's only pave halfway through the bracelet, while the bottom half is solid gold - I was told that the regular JUC doesn't have pave diamonds all the way due to the hinge mechanism - I have a feeling if they do release a thin pave JUC it would be full diamonds all around which would be cool!
Click to expand...

This is so true!
 
#1,991
I love the thin one. I see these pros over the regular:
-No risk of losing it since it cant become undone
-The nail head doesnt stick out as much so less chance of smashing it against things
-Looks better stacked with a big face watch like Rolex 36mm.
I would pick the regular as standalone piece or for stacking with regular Love though
 
  • Like
Reactions: BittyMonkey, WingNut and Violet Bleu
#1,994
San2222 said:
I'm in no way a scientist but I don't doubt him as I think since its not thick, the amount of gold still makes it possible for it to be malleable. He knows I'm not interested in the thin version so I don't think he's lying to get a sale. Just sharing what I learned.
Click to expand...
San2222 said:
I was told thin juc is not hollow, it's solid gold.
Click to expand...
My sa just texted me, he double confirmed and it is indeed hollow with added special treatment so that it is bendable. Sorry for the confusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monaliceke, Pursonification, mungoo33 and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top