Johnny Depp
- Thread starter midsamid
- Start date
TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others
Not sure what the heck this is because I can’t see the entire caption of the doc, nor can I read more than a couple of fragments of sentences. But a couple of points - there is no “jurisdictional infirmity” until the judge says there is one. I have never heard of someone claiming that a court has no jurisction over them because they don’t live anywhere. It is one thing to say that a court has no jurisdiction because I don’t live in and I am not domiciled in X state, which there is plenty of law on, and quite another thing to say that I don’t live anywhere so I can’t be sued anywhere.
From what little I could see if the caption, this is just a stipulation extending AH’s time to respond to the first amended complaint. A stip is just a written agreement between parties signed by each side’s counsel and sometimes also signed by the judge.
I don’t see anything about agreeing to a dismissal and I can’t imagine why the ins company would agree to one.
Just to make it a bit more confusing, there are a couple of kinds of dismissals - in one the plaintiff (person who filed suit) can dismiss the case and agree to never bring it again. In another type, the plaintiff can dismiss a case but reserves the right to sue again. So before one can say that the case is over, one must know the precise kind of dismissal that was filed.
This LauraB person is not a lawyer, is she?
From what little I could see if the caption, this is just a stipulation extending AH’s time to respond to the first amended complaint. A stip is just a written agreement between parties signed by each side’s counsel and sometimes also signed by the judge.
I don’t see anything about agreeing to a dismissal and I can’t imagine why the ins company would agree to one.
Just to make it a bit more confusing, there are a couple of kinds of dismissals - in one the plaintiff (person who filed suit) can dismiss the case and agree to never bring it again. In another type, the plaintiff can dismiss a case but reserves the right to sue again. So before one can say that the case is over, one must know the precise kind of dismissal that was filed.
This LauraB person is not a lawyer, is she?
Last edited:
Valid points
No LauraB person isn't a lawyer.
Thank you for your help.
I'm going to stop listening to Laura B and I'm waiting for someone else to talk about this.
Last edited:
Great that you found the whole document! It is what I thought it was - NYM agrees to give AH an extension respond to the first amended complaint. Ironically, we are at 11/17 and the extension only goes to 11/21.
I assume that AH is going to try to get the case dismissed because she can’t be served anywhere. That motion would be the document now due on 11/21. Lawyers for both sides are often required to talk to each other to see if they can come to an agreement before filing motions for a judge to decide. It is always possible that they can also be feeling each other out regarding resolving the case. Or they could be arguing with each other! Can’t tell from what we have here.
That little clip above the stip is an entry done by a court clerk to go into the online docket. Looks like somebody reserved time with the judge for her to decide a discovery dispute. My bet is that the dispute being referred is just the discovery dispute and not the entire case, though it is a bit ambiguous, isn’t it?
Hopefully someone will get whatever is filed by 11/21 so we will know what is happening next!
Amber Heard Countersues Insurance Co. Over Depp Verdict Policy
Amber Heard says her million-dollar insurance policy does, in fact, have to cover her in the Johnny Depp trial and verdict ... and she's asking a judge to confirm it.
www.tmz.com
Johnny Depp is dating his married lawyer from UK defamation trial — Fox News
Johnny Depp has a new romance with attorney Joelle Rich, a London-based mother of two who represented him in his U.K. defamation trial against a British newspaper.apple.news
I'm not sure if Amber Heard's legal team will be filing a brief but some friends of the court leaked this and it has let to be confirmed if this was submitted to the courts in Virginia.
This lady is an appellate court lawyer.
there has been some movement on the case of Depp vs Heard. They have settled. I don't know what is going on with the lawsuit with the insurance companies right now.
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Settle Defamation Case, She'll Pay $1 Million
Amber Heard is closing the book on the defamation case brought by her ex-husband, Johnny Depp -- a decision that's going to cost her 7 figures.
www.tmz.com
kinda sad outcome for her as he obviously has a lot more money and I don't know how many millions she has to sparethere has been some movement on the case of Depp vs Heard. They have settled. I don't know what is going on with the lawsuit with the insurance companies right now.
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Settle Defamation Case, She'll Pay $1 Million
Amber Heard is closing the book on the defamation case brought by her ex-husband, Johnny Depp -- a decision that's going to cost her 7 figures.
I believe I called this outcome months ago. He didn't want the money, he wanted his reputation back. And to get her out of his life forever was probably high on the list toothere has been some movement on the case of Depp vs Heard. They have settled. I don't know what is going on with the lawsuit with the insurance companies right now.
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Settle Defamation Case, She'll Pay $1 Million
Amber Heard is closing the book on the defamation case brought by her ex-husband, Johnny Depp -- a decision that's going to cost her 7 figures.
Her insurance carrier paid the one million.
I am not sure where I read it but the article said it was a negotiated settlement through her carrier. I believe it a smart PR move on Johnny Deep's team to accept one million as full settlement and then donate the funds to charity.