I am so torn between the two. Please help...

What would you get?

  • omega constellation without diamonds

  • michele diamond deco


Results are only viewable after voting.

TPF may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others

I have the two tone Omega Constellation which is about 17 years old. The watch is still in a very good shape, never had a problem. However, I no longer wear it because I became tired of the look, and it looks outdated due to its size and shape. I would not buy the Constellation again if I had the choice. Instead I would save the money for a Cartier. I don't know much about Michele watches, so I do not have any opinion there...
 
I'm not a fan of the Omega style. It looks sort of old-fashioned IMO. Sorry, not trying to hurt anyone feelings, just my humble opinion. :flowers:

The Michele watch is very nice. I think it is very versatile and you can wear it casual or dressed it up, especially because of the diamonds. I also don't think its trendy to the point where it will be out of style, dated, etc. It has a very clean, classic design with a modern twist.
 
The Omega is a better watch, but looks dated.
The Michelle is trendy now, but probably won't endure.

I'd keep looking if I were you. What is your watch budget? Maybe if you told us what you were looking for and price range, we could help you find something?
 
I'm going for the Michele. I really do like the look better, even if Omega is more classic. The Omega look is a little too 80s to me. I guess that's the idea behind an enduring classic piece (unlike a Michele which can be trendy) but I don't know... I just don't love the Omega at first sight and I like the little diamonds on the Michele.
 
I think Michelle is like 2-3-4-5 years old now. It is big (and it is the trend), still for me it is lacking refinement, sophistication or elegance. It is just pretty bling bling, and after couple of years ... the look is so trendy it will really go out of style... sorryyyy...
 
Top