How to know if you are a good candidate for facial contouring.

[K Couture]

Interesting discussion @KCouture. Maybe that is why Asians are getting bigger noses with silicone to add depth to their faces? A big nose makes a face look smaller. I wish my nose was as big as my Eurasian daughters, then my face would look tiny! You are right. View echoed that I was not a candidate for zygoma reduction because my cheekbones do not protrude from the sides of my face and it is my wide temples/skull which makes my face wide which cannot be altered. I definitely have a wide rounder face compared to my British counterparts.

imo your face is small tho

 

[smallface]

No no i never said wide faces are ugly. There's plenty of women with wide faces who are beautiful. Miranda Kerr like you mentioned is a good example. But you have to remember her face also isn't considered big, its just stronger and wider features with facial dimensions and a good degree of bone depth. Caucasians in general too, tend to have smaller skulls than asians, by a few mms. Kendall jenner also doesnt have a wide features. If we are to compare her to Bella hadid, Bella has stronger stronger features and an overall bigger skull than Kendall.

I remember having dinner with a surgeon and one of this staff. His staff was an absolutely stunning korean girl. More of an oval face but with a slight V in her chin. She commented on how big her face is which I was surprised. Then the surgeon was like "well asians often have larger skulls than caucasians and less facial bone depth. If you hypothetically have two faces with the exact face shape, except one has more bone depth, the face with less bone depth will always look bigger too." So from that statement its a combination of bone depth and overall size of one's face.

Come to think of it, I also have a taiwanese friend who has a square boxy face. Her face overall isn't small either. Its like medium to large? But Ive always thought she's gorgeous. If I were to analyze her face, id say the reason her features work is because she has good bone depth, facial dimensions AND her tissues are actually rather thin. Like if i compare her facial fat deposits AND thickness of her skin to mine, she definitely has less facial fat (except in the buccal fat region cos i had mine removed twice) and thinner skin compared to me. These two factors coupled with her naturally angular face and bone depth, despite having a bigger skull overall, gives her a nice facial contour whereby her facial features are not concealed by thick skin and fatty tissue. Unfortunately, while we can remove some degree of facial fat, skin thickness cannot be changed.

So I think essentially its:

1) thickness of skin
2) thickness of tissues
3) bone depth
4) overall size of the skull
5) degree of facial symmetry

Depressing but informative! When I view my face from the side....it's very flat - you can see the cheekbones almost covering the eye area (profile view) yet it's just my skull overall that's wide. Is there ANYTHING I can do to make the temples and forehead area appear narrower? Because of the wide temples, it makes my eyes look close set.

I have an unnaturally big skull - it's also flat on top and at the back. Is there a procedure for that? I know jogak does surgeries to add depth to the back of the skull to make it look more "rounded".

Also - my eyes are already quite narrow set - will getting a taller nose bridge and higher brow bone make it look even worse? I feel like getting a taller nose bridge is non negotiable to add the appearance of depth to the face.

How do I know for sure if my tissues are thick? I know I have thick skin and I suspect thick tissues but just want to confirm.

Thanks!

 

[smallface]

Also - what exactly do you mean by bone depth and is there any procedure to fix that.

 

[smallface]

No no i never said wide faces are ugly. There's plenty of women with wide faces who are beautiful. Miranda Kerr like you mentioned is a good example. But you have to remember her face also isn't considered big, its just stronger and wider features with facial dimensions and a good degree of bone depth. Caucasians in general too, tend to have smaller skulls than asians, by a few mms. Kendall jenner also doesnt have a wide features. If we are to compare her to Bella hadid, Bella has stronger stronger features and an overall bigger skull than Kendall.

I remember having dinner with a surgeon and one of this staff. His staff was an absolutely stunning korean girl. More of an oval face but with a slight V in her chin. She commented on how big her face is which I was surprised. Then the surgeon was like "well asians often have larger skulls than caucasians and less facial bone depth. If you hypothetically have two faces with the exact face shape, except one has more bone depth, the face with less bone depth will always look bigger too." So from that statement its a combination of bone depth and overall size of one's face.

Come to think of it, I also have a taiwanese friend who has a square boxy face. Her face overall isn't small either. Its like medium to large? But Ive always thought she's gorgeous. If I were to analyze her face, id say the reason her features work is because she has good bone depth, facial dimensions AND her tissues are actually rather thin. Like if i compare her facial fat deposits AND thickness of her skin to mine, she definitely has less facial fat (except in the buccal fat region cos i had mine removed twice) and thinner skin compared to me. These two factors coupled with her naturally angular face and bone depth, despite having a bigger skull overall, gives her a nice facial contour whereby her facial features are not concealed by thick skin and fatty tissue. Unfortunately, while we can remove some degree of facial fat, skin thickness cannot be changed.

So I think essentially its:

1) thickness of skin
2) thickness of tissues
3) bone depth
4) overall size of the skull
5) degree of facial symmetry

BTW what's the verdict on this transformation. I think it's incredible but how it looks in photos might be different to how it looks in real life (3D angle wise)

Regardless, definitely an upgrade. I'd like to know how he made his eyes much longer considering he didn't look like he had much space to work with for lateral cantho. Not a fan of the smooth kpop look but considering his original looks this is definitely so much better.

Anyone know who his surgeon is?

More pics

 

[K Couture]

View attachment 5336829

BTW what's the verdict on this transformation. I think it's incredible but how it looks in photos might be different to how it looks in real life (3D angle wise)

Regardless, definitely an upgrade. I'd like to know how he made his eyes much longer considering he didn't look like he had much space to work with for lateral cantho. Not a fan of the smooth kpop look but considering his original looks this is definitely so much better.

Anyone know who his surgeon is?

More pics
View attachment 5336830

there's a good deal of editing/photoshop in his afters + filters. His nose was certainly edited alot. Its not possible to go from his original nose to that. His structure simply does not allow for it. He did have a nice and symmetrical nose originally. His natural alars tho, while wide, were in an ideal shape to create definition (notice how they orignally were diagonally flared). But his lack of a bridge would not give his skin enough elasticity to augment the nose so much, nor will his bulbous tip allow for a tip thats so small and defined. There is a limitation to how much a nose can be changed based on the pre existing structure. Definite photoshop

Also if you referring to facial contouring:

1) he didnt have big facial bones to begin with (ideal)
2) he is man and men tend to have more facial bone depth than women
3) his post op facial structure isnt considered defined or angular. The only thing that's more defined post op is the chin

For the eyes it would be dei + lateral catho + lateral catepexy + epicantho

 

[Hautelady]

I have been getting alot of people ask me this recently so I figure Ill do a post with photos explaining in as detailed as possible. An ideal candidate for facial contouring is someone who meets the following criteria:

1) Relatively small facial bones
2) Thin tissues (thick tissues can conceal the contour of the final result)
3) Protruding facial bones (Note that there's a difference between having a big face because your facial bones are overall naturally wide, versus having a big face because your facial bones are protruding.

If you look at the first photo, the red line depicts the point in which actual facial bone protrusion is present. This should give indication of how much bone manipulation is possible. The surgeon can realistically only resect the bones within this guideline. The reason why the surgeon cannot go beyond this limitation is because doing so will damage the facial nerves and connective tissues, including the motor nerves. Damaging motor serves = you look like you have a stroke. Note the location of the facial nerves in the Diagram picture. But also note that facial nerves also run under the bone too through to the inner cheek wall.

Now for the zygoma reduction many surgeons will explain it to the patient as "pushing in" the bone. What they really mean is, resection is performed via a clean fracture which then reattaches the bone with titanium wiring, screws or patented pin (depending on the technique used). The limitaton to which the width of the zygoma can be reduced is towards the temple line.

When it comes to mandible reduction, the surgeon cannot "push" the bones inwards. That's not possible because of how lower jaw is connected to the upper jaw AND there are huge motor nerves running through that region. Bear in mind that width is only altered via bone resection IF there is protrusion. A patient with no bone protusion will only yield changes in the SHAPE of their square jaw and NOT the width. However, even if a patient has no bone protrusion at the mandible angle and has overall naturally wide facial bones like the asian lady in the picture (her face isnt actually considered big btw but I used that picture to depict facial bones which are NOT ideal for facial contouring), if width is partially due to jaw MUSCLES, then jaw botox will make a noticable improvement. Patients with bone structures like the asian lady really dont have much room to "push" the zygoma inwards, nor will they see width improvements from mandible resection, only a change in shape will be yielded. Once more, the width can be reduced via botox IF strong and large facial muscles are present.

I also edited the picture of the actress to give an idea of how much change is possible for someone who is an ideal candidate, by changing her features according to her anatomical structural guidelines. In constrast if you look at the facial structure of the asian lady, I am sure you can tell the differences and why a patient with her structure would never yield much improvement.

Another important thing to note

If you are NOT an ideal candidate, be prepared to expect premature aging. There is a reason why these procedures are seldom performed on older patients. Premature aging / sagging is dependant on the follow:

1) Does the patient have bone protusion?
2) The laxity of the patient's facial muscles/tissues. Remember, the bones are the structure holding these in place. Once this has been altered sagging will occur in both ideal and non-ideal candiates. However those who are NOT ideal candidates will experience premature aging to a greater extent
3) age of the patient as these coincides with point number 2.

Note: Premature aging / sagging is may not be noticeable soon after surgery. Some notice it a year after surgery, whilst some take longer to notice it. It just depends on the laxity of your facial muscles / tissues. I only noticed my jowels sagging well over a year after my surgery.

So at the end of the day its for the patient to have realistic expectations, and consider "IF i am not the ideal candidate, am I willing to undergo these procedures knowing my results will not be the most ideal AND I will have to deal with premature aging at some point". I personally believe if the patient is mentally prepared to have a face lift later on, then it shouldnt be much of an issue. However, note that the facelift should not be done at the same time or too soon after facial contouring. For example, Mrsking who used to be active here years ago, did her facial contouring and lifting at the same time and ended up with inaccurate results from the facelift. The ONLY form of lifting you can do at the same time ONLY works for together with the zygoma reduction. Its called a periostiem lift and it mitigates sagging which occurs post zygoma reduction. It does not address the jowels. Hence, given that, its probably best to just do a full on smas lift seperately as a the smas will address both the upper and lower face / jowels at the same time.

View attachment 5314126

View attachment 5314149

View attachment 5314150

View attachment 5314151

How can you tell if one

I have been getting alot of people ask me this recently so I figure Ill do a post with photos explaining in as detailed as possible. An ideal candidate for facial contouring is someone who meets the following criteria:

1) Relatively small facial bones
2) Thin tissues (thick tissues can conceal the contour of the final result)
3) Protruding facial bones (Note that there's a difference between having a big face because your facial bones are overall naturally wide, versus having a big face because your facial bones are protruding.

If you look at the first photo, the red line depicts the point in which actual facial bone protrusion is present. This should give indication of how much bone manipulation is possible. The surgeon can realistically only resect the bones within this guideline. The reason why the surgeon cannot go beyond this limitation is because doing so will damage the facial nerves and connective tissues, including the motor nerves. Damaging motor serves = you look like you have a stroke. Note the location of the facial nerves in the Diagram picture. But also note that facial nerves also run under the bone too through to the inner cheek wall.

Now for the zygoma reduction many surgeons will explain it to the patient as "pushing in" the bone. What they really mean is, resection is performed via a clean fracture which then reattaches the bone with titanium wiring, screws or patented pin (depending on the technique used). The limitaton to which the width of the zygoma can be reduced is towards the temple line.

When it comes to mandible reduction, the surgeon cannot "push" the bones inwards. That's not possible because of how lower jaw is connected to the upper jaw AND there are huge motor nerves running through that region. Bear in mind that width is only altered via bone resection IF there is protrusion. A patient with no bone protusion will only yield changes in the SHAPE of their square jaw and NOT the width. However, even if a patient has no bone protrusion at the mandible angle and has overall naturally wide facial bones like the asian lady in the picture (her face isnt actually considered big btw but I used that picture to depict facial bones which are NOT ideal for facial contouring), if width is partially due to jaw MUSCLES, then jaw botox will make a noticable improvement. Patients with bone structures like the asian lady really dont have much room to "push" the zygoma inwards, nor will they see width improvements from mandible resection, only a change in shape will be yielded. Once more, the width can be reduced via botox IF strong and large facial muscles are present.

I also edited the picture of the actress to give an idea of how much change is possible for someone who is an ideal candidate, by changing her features according to her anatomical structural guidelines. In constrast if you look at the facial structure of the asian lady, I am sure you can tell the differences and why a patient with her structure would never yield much improvement.

Another important thing to note

If you are NOT an ideal candidate, be prepared to expect premature aging. There is a reason why these procedures are seldom performed on older patients. Premature aging / sagging is dependant on the follow:

1) Does the patient have bone protusion?
2) The laxity of the patient's facial muscles/tissues. Remember, the bones are the structure holding these in place. Once this has been altered sagging will occur in both ideal and non-ideal candiates. However those who are NOT ideal candidates will experience premature aging to a greater extent
3) age of the patient as these coincides with point number 2.

Note: Premature aging / sagging is may not be noticeable soon after surgery. Some notice it a year after surgery, whilst some take longer to notice it. It just depends on the laxity of your facial muscles / tissues. I only noticed my jowels sagging well over a year after my surgery.

So at the end of the day its for the patient to have realistic expectations, and consider "IF i am not the ideal candidate, am I willing to undergo these procedures knowing my results will not be the most ideal AND I will have to deal with premature aging at some point". I personally believe if the patient is mentally prepared to have a face lift later on, then it shouldnt be much of an issue. However, note that the facelift should not be done at the same time or too soon after facial contouring. For example, Mrsking who used to be active here years ago, did her facial contouring and lifting at the same time and ended up with inaccurate results from the facelift. The ONLY form of lifting you can do at the same time ONLY works for together with the zygoma reduction. Its called a periostiem lift and it mitigates sagging which occurs post zygoma reduction. It does not address the jowels. Hence, given that, its probably best to just do a full on smas lift seperately as a the smas will address both the upper and lower face / jowels at the same time.

View attachment 5314126

View attachment 5314149

View attachment 5314150

View attachment 5314151

Yikes, that facial nerve is where the doc will actually cut you open for facelift!

How can one tell if you have thick or thin tissues or even thick or thin skin? Is it via cheek pinching?
I think I was told I have thin skin since they can see the capillaries without magnifying glass.
But when I had threadlift, it unraveled only after 2 months. So maybe I have thick tissues?
Are those with thick (chunky?) tissues even candidates for SMAS lift?

 

[K Couture]

How can you tell if one


Yikes, that facial nerve is where the doc will actually cut you open for facelift!

How can one tell if you have thick or thin tissues or even thick or thin skin? Is it via cheek pinching?
I think I was told I have thin skin since they can see the capillaries without magnifying glass.
But when I had threadlift, it unraveled only after 2 months. So maybe I have thick tissues?
Are those with thick (chunky?) tissues even candidates for SMAS lift?

Its fairly obvious. I mean the two pics in the original post, the caucasian lady has thin tissues and thin skin whilst the asian lady has thick tissues and thicker skin, although hers isn't really that bad. There's plenty of asians with much thicker tissues and skin than her.

Nothing to do with thread lift. Its just crap period. It doesn't last long for anyone

Everyone is a candidate for the smas lift. But i have seen older aunties who are on the plump side, their results aren't as dramatic as the slimmer ladies

 

[Hamtaro13]

there's a good deal of editing/photoshop in his afters + filters. His nose was certainly edited alot. Its not possible to go from his original nose to that. His structure simply does not allow for it. He did have a nice and symmetrical nose originally. His natural alars tho, while wide, were in an ideal shape to create definition (notice how they orignally were diagonally flared). But his lack of a bridge would not give his skin enough elasticity to augment the nose so much, nor will his bulbous tip allow for a tip thats so small and defined. There is a limitation to how much a nose can be changed based on the pre existing structure. Definite photoshop

Also if you referring to facial contouring:

1) he didnt have big facial bones to begin with (ideal)
2) he is man and men tend to have more facial bone depth than women
3) his post op facial structure isnt considered defined or angular. The only thing that's more defined post op is the chin

For the eyes it would be dei + lateral catho + lateral catepexy + epicantho

He actually went through 7 different nose jobs to get that kind of structure. Lots of filter here still.
He didn’t disclose where he got surgeries however.

 

[jellybelly17]

Can someone please tell me if I would benefit from Zygoma reduction? Or any other procedure you would suggest? At 30, I would like to have a slimmer and more defined face.


I’m planning to have rhinoplasty at Koko Plastic surgery with Dr Cho Bae Jung and submental liposuction (fox line shaping) at Atop Surgery, but was wondering if I would also benefit from facial contouring procedures.

 

[jcsf2022]

Its fairly obvious. I mean the two pics in the original post, the caucasian lady has thin tissues and thin skin whilst the asian lady has thick tissues and thicker skin, although hers isn't really that bad. There's plenty of asians with much thicker tissues and skin than her.

Nothing to do with thread lift. Its just crap period. It doesn't last long for anyone

Everyone is a candidate for the smas lift. But i have seen older aunties who are on the plump side, their results aren't as dramatic as the slimmer ladies

imo your face is small tho

Is there a surgeon you recommend for FC surgery in Korea? I have been trying to decide between DA and Braun but it’s difficult to decide given that I am in the US. I am open to other surgeon s as well. Thank you.

I have been getting alot of people ask me this recently so I figure Ill do a post with photos explaining in as detailed as possible. An ideal candidate for facial contouring is someone who meets the following criteria:

1) Relatively small facial bones
2) Thin tissues (thick tissues can conceal the contour of the final result)
3) Protruding facial bones (Note that there's a difference between having a big face because your facial bones are overall naturally wide, versus having a big face because your facial bones are protruding.

If you look at the first photo, the red line depicts the point in which actual facial bone protrusion is present. This should give indication of how much bone manipulation is possible. The surgeon can realistically only resect the bones within this guideline. The reason why the surgeon cannot go beyond this limitation is because doing so will damage the facial nerves and connective tissues, including the motor nerves. Damaging motor serves = you look like you have a stroke. Note the location of the facial nerves in the Diagram picture. But also note that facial nerves also run under the bone too through to the inner cheek wall.

Now for the zygoma reduction many surgeons will explain it to the patient as "pushing in" the bone. What they really mean is, resection is performed via a clean fracture which then reattaches the bone with titanium wiring, screws or patented pin (depending on the technique used). The limitaton to which the width of the zygoma can be reduced is towards the temple line.

When it comes to mandible reduction, the surgeon cannot "push" the bones inwards. That's not possible because of how lower jaw is connected to the upper jaw AND there are huge motor nerves running through that region. Bear in mind that width is only altered via bone resection IF there is protrusion. A patient with no bone protusion will only yield changes in the SHAPE of their square jaw and NOT the width. However, even if a patient has no bone protrusion at the mandible angle and has overall naturally wide facial bones like the asian lady in the picture (her face isnt actually considered big btw but I used that picture to depict facial bones which are NOT ideal for facial contouring), if width is partially due to jaw MUSCLES, then jaw botox will make a noticable improvement. Patients with bone structures like the asian lady really dont have much room to "push" the zygoma inwards, nor will they see width improvements from mandible resection, only a change in shape will be yielded. Once more, the width can be reduced via botox IF strong and large facial muscles are present.

I also edited the picture of the actress to give an idea of how much change is possible for someone who is an ideal candidate, by changing her features according to her anatomical structural guidelines. In constrast if you look at the facial structure of the asian lady, I am sure you can tell the differences and why a patient with her structure would never yield much improvement.

Another important thing to note

If you are NOT an ideal candidate, be prepared to expect premature aging. There is a reason why these procedures are seldom performed on older patients. Premature aging / sagging is dependant on the follow:

1) Does the patient have bone protusion?
2) The laxity of the patient's facial muscles/tissues. Remember, the bones are the structure holding these in place. Once this has been altered sagging will occur in both ideal and non-ideal candiates. However those who are NOT ideal candidates will experience premature aging to a greater extent
3) age of the patient as these coincides with point number 2.

Note: Premature aging / sagging is may not be noticeable soon after surgery. Some notice it a year after surgery, whilst some take longer to notice it. It just depends on the laxity of your facial muscles / tissues. I only noticed my jowels sagging well over a year after my surgery.

So at the end of the day its for the patient to have realistic expectations, and consider "IF i am not the ideal candidate, am I willing to undergo these procedures knowing my results will not be the most ideal AND I will have to deal with premature aging at some point". I personally believe if the patient is mentally prepared to have a face lift later on, then it shouldnt be much of an issue. However, note that the facelift should not be done at the same time or too soon after facial contouring. For example, Mrsking who used to be active here years ago, did her facial contouring and lifting at the same time and ended up with inaccurate results from the facelift. The ONLY form of lifting you can do at the same time ONLY works for together with the zygoma reduction. Its called a periostiem lift and it mitigates sagging which occurs post zygoma reduction. It does not address the jowels. Hence, given that, its probably best to just do a full on smas lift seperately as a the smas will address both the upper and lower face / jowels at the same time.

View attachment 5314126

View attachment 5314149

View attachment 5314150

View attachment 5314151

thank you for your post!
Is there a surgeon you recommend for FC surgery in Korea? I have been trying to decide between DA and Braun but it’s difficult to decide. I am open to other surgeon/suggestions as well. Thank you.

No no i never said wide faces are ugly. There's plenty of women with wide faces who are beautiful. Miranda Kerr like you mentioned is a good example. But you have to remember her face also isn't considered big, its just stronger and wider features with facial dimensions and a good degree of bone depth. Caucasians in general too, tend to have smaller skulls than asians, by a few mms. Kendall jenner also doesnt have a wide features. If we are to compare her to Bella hadid, Bella has stronger stronger features and an overall bigger skull than Kendall.

I remember having dinner with a surgeon and one of this staff. His staff was an absolutely stunning korean girl. More of an oval face but with a slight V in her chin. She commented on how big her face is which I was surprised. Then the surgeon was like "well asians often have larger skulls than caucasians and less facial bone depth. If you hypothetically have two faces with the exact face shape, except one has more bone depth, the face with less bone depth will always look bigger too." So from that statement its a combination of bone depth and overall size of one's face.

Come to think of it, I also have a taiwanese friend who has a square boxy face. Her face overall isn't small either. Its like medium to large? But Ive always thought she's gorgeous. If I were to analyze her face, id say the reason her features work is because she has good bone depth, facial dimensions AND her tissues are actually rather thin. Like if i compare her facial fat deposits AND thickness of her skin to mine, she definitely has less facial fat (except in the buccal fat region cos i had mine removed twice) and thinner skin compared to me. These two factors coupled with her naturally angular face and bone depth, despite having a bigger skull overall, gives her a nice facial contour whereby her facial features are not concealed by thick skin and fatty tissue. Unfortunately, while we can remove some degree of facial fat, skin thickness cannot be changed.

So I think essentially its:

1) thickness of skin
2) thickness of tissues
3) bone depth
4) overall size of the skull
5) degree of facial symmetry

 

[K Couture]

Can someone please tell me if I would benefit from Zygoma reduction? Or any other procedure you would suggest? At 30, I would like to have a slimmer and more defined face.


I’m planning to have rhinoplasty at Koko Plastic surgery with Dr Cho Bae Jung and submental liposuction (fox line shaping) at Atop Surgery, but was wondering if I would also benefit from facial contouring procedures.

View attachment 5374195View attachment 5374196View attachment 5374197

actually hard to tell in your case exactly because you have a decent amount of facial fat which is concealing the actual shape of your bone structure. Youll know exactly once you see a ct scan of your facial bones

 

[K Couture]

Is there a surgeon you recommend for FC surgery in Korea? I have been trying to decide between DA and Braun but it’s difficult to decide given that I am in the US. I am open to other surgeon s as well. Thank you.

thank you for your post!
Is there a surgeon you recommend for FC surgery in Korea? I have been trying to decide between DA and Braun but it’s difficult to decide. I am open to other surgeon/suggestions as well. Thank you.

I feel DA is overpriced af and has a reasonable number of negative feedback due to various reasons. Braun a guy in my kakao group just did his facial contouring there. Still swollen so he hasnt updated us on whether he likes his results yet or not. But he did get a relatively decent price there. You can also try out Dr Kim from Dream (he is more on the conservative side), Dr kim from Hyundai who does tends to yield more dramatic results (as long as your bone structure anatomically allows for it). I was recently there and saw some Thai patients in the wait room who did FC with him and it turned out pretty nice. A girl from my kakao group also recently did it with him and got a really good price for Zygoma Mandible and genioplasty combination. And Girin Dr lee i believe is good for FC too. Maiq and Mrsking did their fc with them a few years back. Girin has a set price list for both locals and foreigners so they do not overcharge

 

[jcsf2022]

Thank you!

 

[philirina45]

Can someone please tell me if I would benefit from Zygoma reduction? Or any other procedure you would suggest? At 30, I would like to have a slimmer and more defined face.


I’m planning to have rhinoplasty at Koko Plastic surgery with Dr Cho Bae Jung and submental liposuction (fox line shaping) at Atop Surgery, but was wondering if I would also benefit from facial contouring procedures.

View attachment 5374195View attachment 5374196View attachment 5374197

You are so pretty!

 

[jellybelly17]

You are so pretty!

Thank you for your kind words ☺️